Excerpts

Interestingly, this SNP was also close to significance for WS ( p = 3.5 × 10 − 5 , not shown in the table).

The difference in distribution between cleaners, nurses, and interns was statistically highly significant ( p = 3.5 E−05, OR = 10.5, 95% CI: 2.8–39.5). 4.

The increase of 12.9% in the gamma power from P 100 N 100 to P 100 N 100 Att was highly significant ( p = 3.5×10 −5 , N = 96, t test).

This approach was further supported by a highly significant effect of the learning configuration × experimental phase interaction ( F = 10.4; p = 3.52 × 10 −05 ) when expanding the model across both phases.

In the TCGA breast cancer dataset, we found a highly significant enrichment of Rank-1 cis genes among genes with amplification-driven gene dependencies (Fisher test one-sided P-value = 3.53e-5).

Nominally significant associations with PD risk were identified for four SNPs: XRCC6 rs5751129 ( p = 3.55 × 10−5), XRCC4 rs28360071 ( p = 0.0181), NBN rs2735383 ( p = 0.0213) and RAD50 rs17772583 ( p = 0.0411).

Nonetheless, the highly significant p -value we obtain for the association mitochondrial genes and AAO of PD ( p -value = 3.56E-05) and the recognized importance of mitochondrial function in aging would suggest that this finding is likely to be robust.

In model B, the significance level did not change much and remained highly significant ( p = 3.6 × 10 –5 ) ( Table 3 ).

We found a highly significant association ( p = 3.6 × 10 −5 ), with secondary bile acid-producing genes only predicted to be present in samples that also had high predicted levels of butyrate-producing genes (Fig. 7b ).

restricta showed a decreasing trend, while M. globosa increased at Week 2 and Week 4 compared to Week 0 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p =3.63×10 −5 and 1.56×10 −5 , respectively; Fig. 4C ).

The most common SNP among the causal SNPs was C4S1878 (MAF = 0.16), also in the KDR gene, but it failed to reach significance (−log( P ) = 4.44).

According to an ANOVA analysis the difference in plant biomass is highly significant ( p -value = 3.64e-05) between the two treatments.

Treatment effects were highly significant on both day 6 ( p = 3.7 × 10 −5 ) and particularly day 10 ( p = 2.3 × 10 −9 ).

The DAVID program identified one cluster, characterized by a highly significant enrichment of genes involved in antigen processing and presentation ( p = 3.7e-5).

However, PAR in the recently colonised areas and the nearest range core sites (Fennoscandia, Baltic countries, Germany, and Poland) showed a highly significant negative relationship with latitude ( r 2 = 0.92, β = −3.96 × 10 −4 , SE = 4.31 × 10 −5 , t = −9.19, p = 3.73 × 10 −5 ).

Simply combining all genes (excluding those on the X chromosome) into a single confusion matrix yields highly significant predictability scores (Fig. 3g , average score = 2.2, p ~ 3.74e-5, 3 time points, 5 quads).

Other highly significant associated pathways in this module are all immune-related, of which the most significant is Natural killer cell mediated cytotoxity (P-value = 3.8E -5 ).

Females from 1999 to 2008 showed a negative trend (APC − 0.9298%/year, 95% CI: -1.2649 to -0.5937, P = 0.000038), changing into an upward trend shift from 2008 to 2018 (APC 0.9979%/year, 95% CI: 0.6830 to 1.3138, P = 0.000008), continuing through 2018 up until 2021 (APC 8.0298%/year, 95% CI: 4.7989 to 11.3602, P = 0.000085) (Fig. 3 C).

The difference between either of these cohorts and the mutant IDH1 cohort is highly significant (p = 3.8 × 10 −5 ; and 4.0 × 10 −4 , respectively; Figure 2A ).

4d , left); an increase in mutational frequency with age was highly significant for males ( p = 3.8 E − 5 ), but not for females.

1.95 μg/g, respectively; p = 0.00042), and a similar, highly significant elevation was observed for Cu (median 61.68 vs. 38.43 μg/g, respectively; p = 3.81e-5).

It is also nominally significant in the IGAP GWAS ( p -value = 3.86 × 10 −5 ).

Ketamine concentrations also showed a highly significant difference ( W = 264, adjusted P = 0.0000389), again with higher concentrations recorded in England.

Beginning with occurrence as source language and LPI rank, we note that the correlation is positive, not exceptionally strong, but clearly significant ( R = 0.41, p = 3.9e-05).

The difference between the two areas was highly significant (two-sample t test, t (1405) = 3.2, p = 3.9 × 10 −5 ).