Barely Significant
← all phrases

a positive trend

1,734 sentences · 1,734 papers · 20,246 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a positive trendp < 0.5%0.1× alphagold
0.1 logMAR at baseline in left eye), with a positive trend in mean deviation (MD) on 24-2 Humphrey VF (right eye: MD −6.65 dB, p < 0.5%—at diagnosis vs. −4.13 dB, p < 0.5%—after 3 months of Idebenone; left eye: MD −4.37 dB, p < 0.5%—at diagnosis vs. −1.85 dB, p < 0.5%—after 3 months of Idebenone) ( Figure 5 ) and a subjectively perceived improvement.
a positive trendp < 0.0080.2× alphagold
At the 3-month follow-up, all patients in intervention group 1 had either maintained or improved their overall quality of life, associated with a positive trend toward maintenance and improvement in nutritional status ( p < 0.008) and adequate food intake ( p < 0.01).
a positive trendp = 0.010.2× alphagold
When accounting for multiple testing, there was no relationship between single PSSI scale t-scores and ppFEV 1 , BMI, CFQ-R overall score, therapy adherence, and CS, despite a trend for a negative linear relationship between (1) ‘schizotypal (ST)’ t-scores and CS ( p = 0.03, d = 0.44 [per change in 1 SD]; Table 3 ) and (2) ‘depressed (DP)’ t-scores and the CFQ-R overall score ( p = 0.03, d = 0.41) as well as a positive trend for a linear relationship between (3) ‘depressed (DP)’ t-scores and CS ( p = 0.01, d = 0.62 (per change in 1 SD)) and (4) ‘compulsive (ZW)’ t-scores and ppFEV1 ( p = 0.04, d = 0.46).
a positive trendp = .0100.2× alphagold
The direction of the simple slopes for each condition suggests a pro-inflammatory phenotype had a positive trend on stress recovery in the nature condition (SNS: β = -0.335, 95% CI [-0.586, -0.083], p = .010; RMSSD: β = 0.134, 95% CI [-0.117, 0.385], p = .290; PNS: β = 0.186, 95% CI [-0.043, 0.414], p = 0.110) but a negative trend on stress recovery in the office condition (SNS: β = 0.055, 95% CI [-0.202, 0.311], p = .671; RMSSD: β = -0.248, 95% CI [-0.502, 0.007], p = .056; PNS: β = -0.148, 95% CI [-0.381, 0.084], p = .206), although these trends were modest and mostly non-significant.