Barely Significant
← all phrases

an increasing trend

63,972 sentences · 63,972 papers · 105,713 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

an increasing trendP > 0.051.0× alphagold
Moreover, there was no significant difference in the incidence of respiratory system, gastrointestinal system, circulatory system, nervous system complications and sepsis between smaller twins and larger twins in sFGR and MCDA-C twins, although an increasing trend of neonatal complications was observed in sFGR-S more than that in sFGR-L ( P > 0.05) (Table 2 ).
a decreasing trendP < 0.051.0× alphagold
Compared to the mild coronary artery stenosis group (Gensini≤31), the moderate-to-severe coronary artery stenosis group (Gensini>31) had significantly higher proportions of males and individuals with a history of smoking, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).Laboratory tests revealed that in the Gensini >31 group, WBC, NE, CRP, Scr, UA, LDH, cTnT, and NT-proBNP levels were significantly higher compared to the Gensini ≤31 group (all P < 0.05).Regarding echocardiographic parameters, the Gensini >31 group showed an increasing trend in LVEDD and a decreasing trend in LVEF, with both differences being statistically significant (P < 0.05).
an increasing trendp < 0.051.0× alphagold
Serum creatinine levels was also had an increasing trend across increasing TF intakes (89.6, 92.5 and 94.2 μmol/L in the first, second and third tertile, respectively; p < 0.05) There was no significant difference between prevalent diabetes (3.4% vs. 5.1%) and HTN (10.3% vs. 8.3%), as well as mean CVD risk score (19.8 vs. 19.9) in the highest compared to the lowest tertile of TF.
an increasing trendP>0.051.0× alphagold
Both LOM LSPV denervation and LSG Denervation significantly reduce cardiac sympathetic nervous activity (lower LF: 1.05±1.14 vs 2.36 ± 2.34 ms 2 in group 2 and 0.51 ± 0.39 vs 2.24 ± 1.53 ms 2 in group 3; and LF/HF ratio: 0.35±0.21 vs 1.65 ± 1.04 in group 2 and 0.27±0.28 vs 1.42 ± 0.77 in group 3; all P<0.05) but neither had a significant effect on parasympathetic nervous activity though which showed an increasing trend (HF: 2.69±2.00 vs 2.01 ± 2.14 in group 2 and 2.66±1.74 vs 1.95 ± 1.60 in group 3, P>0.05).