“borderline significant”

Median performance scores did not differ significantly between women (4.8, IQR 3.7–6.0) and men (5.0 IQR 3.6–6.0) However, satisfaction with performance was slightly lower among women (median 3.0, IQR 2.0–4.5) than among men (median 3.5, IQR 2.3–4.7), although this difference was borderline significant ( p = 0.05) (Table 4 ).

Impact of COVID-19 Our statistical analysis revealed that individuals with a history of COVID-19 infection had a higher risk of developing IBS compared to those without such a history, although this result was only borderline significant (OR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.01–2.15, P = 0.050).

The effects of smoking on complications were similar in PTNBs performed using the core needle biopsy technique, but the association between smoking history and hemoptysis was borderline significant (current smoking, p = 0.05; heavy smoking, p = 0.06; Table S5 ).

Relative to controls, patients with asthma had an increased risk of hospitalization for COVID-19 (fully adjusted hazard ratio=1.33; 95% CI=1.08–1.64; p=0.01) and borderline significant (p=0.05) higher rates of ICU admissions in the pre-delta period but not during the delta or Omicron periods.

Linear modelling Among the selected predictors, the number of long term time series, population density, sustainable development index, and the number of tourists were found to be highly significant ( p < 0.05), whereas country growth and Trompenaar’s 7th dimension were borderline significant ( p = 0.05–0.06; Supplement 4).

Still, there was a borderline significant difference between the groups vis-à-vis educational attainment ( P =0.05).

Conversely, borderline significant differences were observed in WBC count on day3, day5, and day7 after CC ( P < 0.05) except for day1.

27.4 cm) than in the impaired development group, but this difference was only borderline significant ( P= 0.05) in this cohort.

Interaction analyses between dicarbonyls and sex for fibrosis category revealed a borderline significant interaction for MGO × sex ( p = 0.05, OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.25–1.00), a significant interaction for GO × sex ( p = 0.002, OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.24–0.72), and no significant interaction for 3‐DG × sex ( p = 0.46, OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.45–1.44).

This also appeared to be the case for women with a family history of breast cancer; however, the association was only borderline significant (OR = 0.87, 95% CI [0.76-1.00], p = 0.05) (Table 2 ).

The primary endpoint, a reduction in DGF from 26.5 to 20.8%, was only borderline significant ( p = 0.05) when one-sided statistical tests were used in the analysis.

Excluding the patients that had no measurable CTCs, there was a borderline significant difference between median CTC count in the patients that did and that did not have HER2-positive CTCs ( p = 0.05, Mann–Whitney U test).

There was a borderline significant relationship between higher levels of donor INS ‐cfDNA and lower islet yield [−0.38 (0.18), p = .050] (Table 2 ).

The MI group had a greater proportion of smokers (68.75%) compared to the control group (50.00%), with a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.050).

The association of plasma docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) levels with the risk of POAG was borderline significant (hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.17–1.01; P = 0.05).

Furthermore, upon accounting for these confounders, there was a borderline significant difference for TyG across the tertiles of hPDI (P-value = 0.05) and a significant difference for TG (P-value = 0.04) in the adjusted model.

The meta-analysis revealed a slightly higher risk of delirium in male patients compared to female patients, although the difference was borderline significant (risk ratio [RR] = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.26, p = 0.050).

SM had a significant deceleration of TL-mAA compared to NS (Tukey’s HSD test P = 0.008), and EC had a borderline significant decelaration of TL-mAA compared to NS (Tukey’s HSD test P = 0.05, Table 1 , F i g. 1 I).

Age was also found to be a borderline significant factor (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.89–1.01, P = 0.05), with younger patients tending to show greater improvement in fibrosis markers and grades.

Post-race right ventricular (RV) dysfunction with reduced strain and increased volumes ( p < 0.05) and borderline significant left ventricular global longitudinal strain reduction ( p = 0.05) were observed.

The meta-analysis revealed a statistically borderline significant reduction in postoperative IOP favoring the AADI at 3 months (mean difference [MD] = −2.74, p =0.05).

In that study the risk was borderline significant for skin melanomas among BRCA2 carriers (6 observed, 2.3 expected); p = 0.05).

The group difference in ‘stds above the surrogate’ was borderline significant, t (44) = 1.99, p = 0.05, d = 0.60, with the IB group mean being slightly higher.

Similar findings were obtained for those using non-aspirin NSAIDs, although the results were only borderline significant (p = 0.050).

For Pb, a borderline significant difference was detected ( p = 0.050), with tub gurnard showing slightly higher mean values; however, this finding is limited by the high proportion of missing Pb data (68.1%).