“borderline significant”

Home O 2 use was borderline significant after adjustment for these additional variables (OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 0.99 - 3.04, P = 0.050.) Figure 1 demonstrates a Kaplan-Meir survival analysis showing a significant increase in all cause mortality in the home O 2 cohort with an overall mean (95% CI) survival time of 6.2 (5.9 - 6.5) years (P < 0.001).

However, when assessing EDSS≥6 as a milestone, IgM-index showed only a borderline significant higher risk (aHR 2.1, 95%CI 1-4.4, p=0.05; Table 2 ) whereas patients with OCMB showed significantly higher risk of reaching EDSS≥6 (aHR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2-5.4, p=0.01; Table 2 and Figure 3B ).

There was a borderline significant effect of TMS on hand endpoint error (F 1,51 = 4.0, p = 0.050), showing greater error with TMS, but no significant Jump x TMS interaction (F 1,51 = 0.3, p = 0.574).

However, only a borderline significant association was observed between very preterm neonates and controls (adjusted OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.03–3.19; P = 0.050).

History of HTN had a borderline significant effect on the occurrence of MACE (HR: 1.295, 95% CI: 0.999, 1.677, p = 0.05).

The number of voxels representing high ΔSI (bolus) muscle values in infected rats, relative to corresponding controls at each time point, showed a steady decline as infection progressed (Linear regression analysis, borderline significant, P = 0.05).

Furthermore, upon accounting for these confounders, there was a borderline significant difference for TyG across the tertiles of hPDI (P-value = 0.05) and a significant difference for TG (P-value = 0.04) in the adjusted model.

A comparison of stimulation protocols showed a borderline significant difference regarding CPR ( p = 0.05).

Notably, these associations remained robust after further adjustment for clinical and SES variables, except that telomere length reduction remained borderline significant after SES adjustment (−68.4 bp, 95% CI −113.1 to −5.7; p=0.05).

However, separate analyses pooling data at each quantile found a significant protective association of fructose intakes at the third (9.5%E, RR = 0.95, 95% CI, 0.92–0.98, p = 0.0004) and fourth (11.2%E, RR = 0.93, 95% CI, 0.93–0.98, p = 0.001) quantiles, and a borderline significant protective association at intakes equivalent to the second quantile (7.9%E, RR = 0.97, 95% CI, 0.95–1.00, p = 0.05; Fig. 3 ).

Accordingly, the ferritin/age ratio was higher in dual‐diagnosis patients compared to CDA II patients, with a borderline significant P‐value (P = 0.05, Mann–Whitney test) (Table 2 ).

While there was a marginally significant positive effect of distance on F ST ( r = 0.25, p = .05), absolute divergence Dxy did not increase significantly with distance ( r = 0.24, p = .11), and pairwise genetic differentiation of Euclidean distances was borderline significant ( r = 0.21, p = .05, Figure 3a,b ; Figure S6 ).

Examining the RG and FG separately, the RG showed a significant 3.0-fold CK increase until week 3 ( p = 0.010), whereas the FG demonstrated only borderline significant changes by the factor 1.5 during the first week ( p = 0.05), peaking at 72 h after WB-EMS ( p = 0.048; r = 0.64).

There was a borderline significant decrease in risk (0.01<P<0.05) with low dose unopposed equine oestrogen, low dose unopposed non-equine oestrogen, high dose unopposed non-equine oestrogen, and continuous high dose non-equine.

Overall, the prevalence of any ocular morbidity was 12% in government schools (186) and 15% in private schools (100) with a borderline significant difference ( P = 0.05; CI = 95%).

Linear Mixed Modelling reported a borderline significant improvement in Processing Speed (t = 1.98, p =.05) for the methylphenidate group.

BMP10 showed a borderline significant protective association in the model adjusted for age and sex (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33–1.00, P = 0.050) ( Table 7 , Figure 1 , Panel C).

Within-group analysis showed a borderline significant improvement in the sham group ( p = 0.05) and a trend toward improvement in the real tDCS group ( p = 0.06).

The main result for the primary outcome is borderline significant (RR=0.85 [0.72-1.00], p=0.05), it is difficult to interpret this result.

Excluding this study reduced I 2 to 0% in the desloratadine subgroup, where the effect became borderline significant ( p = 0.05; MD 5.04, 95% CI –0.05 to 10.12), and yielded a significant overall benefit in favor of the combination therapy with low heterogeneity ( p = 0.005; MD 6.71, 95% CI 2.03 to 11.39; I 2 = 12%).

rs6783836 at ST6GAL1 was associated with HFS in patients treated with XELOX (OR = 3.1, 95% CI = 2.1‐4.6, P = 4.3 × 10 −8 ) and was borderline significant in patients receiving capecitabine from QUASAR2, but with an opposite allele effect (OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.42‐1.03, P = .05).

Female students showed a borderline significant, higher likelihood of appropriate knowledge compared with male students (AOR = 1.63; 95% CI: 0.999–2.65; p = 0.050), while age group was not significantly associated with knowledge ( Table 6 ).

In a systematic review and meta-analysis, ONS significantly increased body weight and improved nutritional status, while its effect on global QoL was borderline significant (MD +4.01, 95% CI: 0.08–7.94; p = 0.05).

Although there was a tendency for Lactobacillus populations to increase after chitosan supplementation, the mean change in the amount of this microbial agent in the chitosan versus placebo group was estimated as borderline significant ( P = 0.05).

Nonparametric Jonckheere-Terpstra test was used to analyze the differences in median PAI-1 serum levels between ordinal HY score groups from 1 to 4 and a borderline significant difference was found between the groups ( p = 0.05).