Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not reach statistical significance”

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 130,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

Further, miR‐579‐3p showed a trend for an interindividual difference from the first to the second biopsy in patients with HCC compared to the cirrhosis cohort, although it did not reach statistical significance (most likely due to a small sample size) (Fig. 2D ).
Intriguingly, the Atm-Null MEFs showed a trend towards increased nuclear envelope rupture inside the small constrictions ( Figure 5H ), consistent with previous findings in lamin A/C-deficient cells ( Denais et al., 2016 ; Raab et al., 2016 ), although this trend did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.11).
ATM Modulates Nuclear Mechanics by Regulating Lamin A Levels.
Front Cell Dev Biol · 2022 · PMC9198445
Lastly, in the smaller subset of patients with GS 3 + 4 = 7 carcinoma [Subset: GS = 3 + 4 = 7 (i.e., Grade Group 2), N = 341 patients], patients with cribriform glands >0.25 mm showed a trend toward lower RFS that was not seen in patients with cribriform glands of any size; however, this finding did not reach statistical significance (univariable p = 0.1).
Among patients with known CAD, the difference in MACE rates between patients with elevated PWV and those with non-elevated PWV showed a trend toward significance, but it did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.053).
The differences in the antibody titers induced through the different DNA- and protein-based vaccines did not reach statistical significance, although recombinant proteins showed a pronounced trend to induce higher antibody titers than vector DNAs at the dosages used here ( Figure 3A ).
In the hippocampal CA1, the results indicate that PID mice showed a trend of decreased numbers in endpoints and branch processes, but this difference did not reach statistical significance ( p > 0.05).
Regarding the laterality effect of noise trauma, the PAC was significant only on the contralateral side ((contralateral noise-exposed (N) = 4157, control (C) = 3297, p = 0.02), (ipsilateral N = 4563, C = 3941, p = 0.34)); changes in contralateral MGB showed a trend, but did not reach statistical significance ((contralateral N = 4405, C = 3829, p = 0.07), (ipsilateral N = 4600, C = 3965, p = 0.14)); and the CA1 was significant bilaterally ((contralateral N = 6325, C = 5252, p = 0.03), (ipsilateral N = 6727, C = 5690, p = 0.04)).