Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not reach statistical significance”

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 130,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

did not reach statistical significanceP > 0.051.0× alphaplainly factual
As shown in Figure 2 , one-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Keuls post hoc tests revealed that PN17 rat mPFC had a significantly higher level of c-Fos ( F (2,20) = 4.36; P = 0.027) compared to adult rats ( P < 0.05) with a decreasing trend from PN17 to PN24 and an even stronger decreasing trend from PN24 to adult age, both of which, however, did not reach statistical significance ( P > 0.05) ( Fig. 2 ).
A recent observational study on acetylsalicylic acid use and iFOBT performance showed a trend towards an increase in sensitivity (from 51.2 to 66.7%) without loss of specificity in acetylsalicylic acid or NSAID users, but the difference did not reach statistical significance, likely due to a relatively low number of acetylsalicylic acid/NSAID users [ 20 ].
Despite a clear trend for a protective effect, the association between inhibition of in vitro sporozoite gliding motility and time to falciparum infection also did not reach statistical significance after adjustment for blood-stage immunity (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.29–1.01).
Overall, survival analyses showed a trend toward better OS for HPV-positive (67% survival) compared to HPV-negative (27% survival) patients but that did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.12), most probably due to the small number of HPV-positive cases ( Figure 4 A). 2.3. p16Ink4a Protein Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining In view of the small number of HPV-positive HNSCC patients found in this cohort, and the limited amount of pathological materials available, a subset of 50 representative specimens were processed for p16 protein IHC staining.
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.071.4× alphaplainly factual
Although there was a slight trend towards a higher oral apparent clearance normalized to body surface area in Asian patients (median [range] 89.4 [25–250] l/h/m 2 ) compared with European patients (median [range] 76.7 [26–235] l/h/m 2 ), this trend did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.07; Fig. 1 a).