Barely Significant
← all phrases

did not reach statistical significance

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 0 search hits before verification

In the literature

showed a trendp = 0.0521.0× alpha
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.1262.5× alphaplainly factual
Although the percent errors of Task 1 ( Figure 2A ) and Task 2 for non-Stroop trials ( Figure 2D ) did not reach statistical significance (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.386; p = 0.126; Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.391; p = 0.121, respectively), Task 2 showed a trend toward a positive association (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.478; p = 0.052) ( Figure 2B ).
The near-significant trends observed—slightly lower hemoglobin ( p = 0.053) and slightly lower corrected calcium ( p = 0.075) in fallers—may reflect potential associations that did not reach statistical significance in this sample and are consistent with prior studies in which anemia and subtle disturbances in calcium homeostasis have been reported to be associated with impaired muscle strength, balance instability, and falls [ 39 , 40 ].
showed a trendp = 0.0531.1× alpha
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.60812.2× alphaplainly factual
Gross total resection showed a trend toward improved survival (HR = 0.563, 95% CI: 0.315–1.007, p = 0.053), though it did not reach statistical significance. 5-ALA remained non-significant in the multivariable model (HR = 0.885, 95% CI: 0.554–1.413, p = 0.608), suggesting that while it improves resection extent, it does not independently affect survival when accounting for other clinical variables. 3.6.
a clear trendp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.0531.1× alphaplainly factual
Although ITGA11 did not reach statistical significance in the multivariate analysis, it showed a clear trend toward being an independent prognostic risk factor (hazard ratio [95% CI]: 2.024 [0.992–4.131], p = 0.053; Table S7 ).
Intravenous agents (Cangrelor/GPi) showed a trend towards lower risk of intraprocedural stent occlusion compared to oral dAPT (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.30, [95% CI, 0.09–1.01], P = .053), though this did not reach statistical significance.