Of these SNP, rs29025980 showed a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) departure from Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) in almost all groups tested (5 out of 8 breed types).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of time ( F 37,962 = 34.6; p < 0.0001) on body mass variations (Fig. 1 a).
Ordinary one-way ANOVA showed highly significant differences among the four severity groups for all three proteins (all P < 0.0001).
We observed a highly significant decrease in global viral mRNA levels from proviruses formed by the acetylation deficient QA mutant IN (20-fold, p<0.0001).
The antibody levels progressively increased with a subsequent booster dose, and all three immunized groups showed a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) elevation in OD values compared to the unvaccinated mice at 35 dpv (OD values: 1.38 ± 0.00, 1.23 ± 0.01, and 0.91 ± 0.01 for vToH-QMV, vToH-DMV, and wt, respectively) ( Figure 3 B, Table S3 ).
Differences in intra-network variability between groups The MSLR test assessing differences in the coefficients of variation of GM volume between groups showed significant group effects between psychosis controls and FEP ( χ 2(1) = 9.13, p = 0.0025), and between Con-PD and PDN ( χ 2(1) = 10.97, p < 0.001), as well as highly significant group effects between Con-PD and PDP ( χ 2(1) = 15.21, p < 0.0001), indicating a higher variability in all patient groups across all networks (Fig. 4 ).
This difference was highly significant, with a p -value of <0.0001 and a mean difference of 7.8 h (95% CI: 6.0 to 8.0), indicating a prolonged analgesic effect when dexamethasone was added to the block, as seen in Table 2 and Figure 2 .
Line effect The morphometric data on Ca.Th and %PoV indicated that the CC line had a highly significant effect, with p < 0.0001 for both traits (Table 1 ).
The difference in representation of our potential targets of T cell recognition and the “pseudotargets” of randomly selected sets in peptides that really elicited T cell response was highly significant for both pentapeptides (39.9% versus 10.2%, P < 0.0001, Cohen’s d = 27.50) and hexapeptides (99.0% versus 73.7%, P < 0.0001, Cohen’s d = 16.2).
The M, H, and D variables were common in all three studies, where M and H were highly significant across each measurement in each study ( p < .0001), with the single exception (βTG and MTES3).
Payment Type (Per Transaction) In a sensitivity analysis classifying each payment into Grant, Hospitality, and Other categories, the Specialty × Payment Class interaction remained highly significant (F-statistic-ANOVA = 10.43, p < 0.0001).
anesthesiologic ICUs there was a highly significant difference between anesthesiologic ICUs compared with other disciplines ( p < 0.0001).
All associations were highly significant in both sexes, P <0.0001.
ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of condition. with maximum in the lower gamma range at 30–45 Hz (p<0.0001, Fig. 3 ).
Notably, cadaverine, N-acetylcadaverine, choline, tryptophan, and glycine exhibited highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001).
As shown in Table 2 , the model selected by the test was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
The differences between the two treatments were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), for both within-group variance (higher in the independent rewards treatment) and between-group variance (higher in the interdependent treatment).
The reduction in Wexner score after 8 weeks of treatment when compared with baseline was highly significant for all NRL001 treatment arms ( p < 0.0001) as well as placebo.
AUC analysis revealed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) between untreated infected animals and all treatment groups.
Box-Behnken design analysis yielded a highly significant quadratic model ( P < 0.0001) with a non-significant lack of fit ( P = 0.5929), indicating excellent model adequacy and reliability (R 2 = 0.9962).
galegae , the LRT was highly significant (P < 0.0001), and the parameter estimates for N. galegae nifQ indicated an increase in the relative rate of non-synonymous substitution by a factor of 3.
This was confirmed via a 2-way permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) analysis which identified a highly significant effect on diversity between adult, tadpole and water samples (F = 10.71; df = 2; p = 0.0001), a significant effect due to the housing conditions (F = 2.84; df = 1; p = 0.0056), but also a significant interaction effect due to the fact that diversity in tadpoles differs significantly between clean and standard conditions whilst it remains consistent in adults (F = 2.69; df = 2; p = 0.0011).
In the first group, there were highly significant differences in the pre and post intervention measures of WOMAC of pain, stiffness, physical function, and total score: p=0.0001 for pain, p=0.0001 for stiffness, p=0.0001 for physical function, and p=0.0001 for the total score.
A highly significant (P < 0.0001) association was found between brucellosis with both consuming raw milk and having contact with cattle.
Relationship between the OD 490 values of anti-PvMSP9 antibodies A pairwise comparison of the OD 490 values for total IgG antibodies to antigens TMS102 and CT1186 displayed a highly significant correlation among sera from 246 patients (Spearman’s r = 0.825, p < 0.0001).