Barely Significant
← all phrases

nominally significant

7,733 sentences · 7,733 papers · 9,414 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.08

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nominally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
Tests of differences in estimated cell-type composition between trisomic and disomic organoids indicated nominally significant differences ( p < 0.05 by Welch’s t -test before multiple hypotheses correction) for three cell-types—glial progenitor cells, cortical neurons, and interneuron—but after Bonferroni-correction these were no longer statistically significant, with p ≥ 0.23 for all cell-types (see Supplementary Table 1 ).
nominally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
Nevertheless, in the Breslow–Day test, we detected that only two (rs72854462 and rs1438898 mapped to TEX41 gene) of the 821 tested SNPs were nominally significant ( p < 0.05), signaling heterogeneity in the odds ratios (OR) of these variants between Mexico and Colombia (see Supplementary Table 3 ).
nominally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
Furthermore, when applying a sequential analysis approach in an N-of-1 framework, we were able to determine that 13 of the 15 individuals with nominally significant systolic blood pressure changes, and 14 of the 18 individuals with diastolic blood pressure changes over six months demonstrated this trend (p < 0.05) by the fifth month of their study enrollment.
nominally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
Given this is a conservative threshold, if no proteins pass this threshold in all participants (APOE+ and APOE–), nominally significant proteins ( p < 0.05) will be considered for MR analysis based on an assessment of their association strength (e.g., how close to Bonferroni threshold) and consistency (e.g., association across subgroups).
nominally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
Parsing the proteins from the genome-wide significant cis-pQTL dataset by whether or not an ITIM/ITAM domain was present, and then examining whether the associated SNP is nominally significant ( p < 0.05) for AD association, found a significant overrepresentation of ITIM/ITAM encoding genes with nominal AD associations.
nominally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
Of the 245 UKB associations (226 previously reported + 19 previously unreported associations), we find that 72% (176) show at least nominally significant ( p < 0.05 ) age-specific effects within UK women ( Figure 2 C). 37 of these 176 associations, representing 15% of all associations, have a slope with a genome-wide significant p value ( p < 5 × 10 − 8 ), constituting a more stringent criterion (strong and moderate evidence in Figure 2C).
nominally significantP < 0.051.0× alphagold
Lastly, we classified the sex-mQTLs with FDR-adjusted P diff < 0.05 into one of the following three categories: (i) concordant effect: association found to be FDR-significant in one sex and nominally significant ( P < 0.05) or FDR-significant in the other sex with a consistent effect direction but different magnitude; FDR-adjusted P diff < 0.05.
nominally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
Of these 20 metabolites, only five showed nominally significant univariate differences between ME/CFS cases and controls (indole-3-propionic acid, aminomalonate, ornithine, leucine, and succinic acid; all p < 0.05), while the majority—including proline and indole-3-lactate, the constituents of the top-ranked interaction term—did not reach univariate significance in isolation ( p = 0.777 and p = 0.237, respectively).