The most influenced SF-36 subscale was PF since the differences, for all the variables studied, were statistically significant except for marital status, which was marginally insignificant ( P = 0.078).
Excerpts
Interestingly, age was not a significant measure predictive of awareness level, but a positive trend emerged where women in the age groups 45–65 were the most aware of EC symptoms among the sample population ( p = 0.078). 30% of the women in these age groups were defined as having an awareness level greater than or equal to one.
156) for human-service workers and borderline significant ( p = . 080) for non-‘human service’ workers.
This difference is an increase from both NSFG 2015–2017 (marginally significant at p = 0.08) and NSFG 2011–2013 (significant, p < 0.05).
However, ‘sleep hours’ did not correlate with workplace accidents for the sample as a whole or when differentiating by sex. Regarding sleep quality variables, marginally significant correlations were found in the case of males between ‘sleep quality (last month)’ with workplace accidents, r (15) = .46; p = .08; and ‘sleepiness’ with commuting accidents, r (15) = .45; p = .09.
Women who delivered in a facility had a 1.8 times higher hazard than women who delivered at home, but the difference is only marginally significant ( p = .08).
borderline significancep = 0.08
The association approached borderline significance when we focused on wives (p = 0.08) only.
almost significantlyp = 0.08
The change of leptin was almost significantly higher in the control group at 6 months (p = 0.08), and significantly higher at 12 months (p = 0.014).
Although, this association was marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.08) in the female sample.
Furthermore, while the all-cause mortality in the third tertile (≥ 19.84 μmol/L) demonstrates an increasing trend compared to the second tertile, it does not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.08).
The Relationship between Physical Performance Tests and Peripheral Fracture In the sub-group of post-menopausal patients, the scores of the tests 'TGUGT', and '8 FTW' were significantly higher in fractured patients compared with women with no previous fractures (14.5 sec ± 8.2 sec vs 11.4 sec ± 4.8 sec; p < 0.001 and 5.4 sec ± 2.6 sec vs 3.9 sec ± 2.0 sec; p < 0.001 respectively); while test '5 TSTS' scores were approaching significance (14.8 sec ± 6.4 sec vs 13.3 sec ± 5.1 sec; p = 0.08) (Figure 2 ).
of borderline significancep = 0.08
The decrease between 1984 and 1986 (21.2% per year) was not significant, and the subsequent increase (2.3% per year) was of borderline significance (p = 0.08).
Nevertheless, when looking at each gender separately the association between hypertension and alcohol or tobacco use was only marginally significant in men with an OR of 1.4 (95% CI: 0.9 to 2.2; p=0.08) and 1.6 (95% CI: 1.0 to 2.7; p=0.07), respectively (Table 3 ).
borderline significancep = 0.08
However, males were more likely to be taking aspirin (52.5%) compared to 40.2% among females with a borderline significance ( p = 0.08) (Table 2 ).
For males who had reported IPV at 21 years and changed partners, 18.6% reported experiencing IPV at the 30 year follow up, a proportion below the 31.9% of abused males at 21 who remained with their partners (borderline significant, p = 0.08).
The prevalence of weight misperception also differed by grade in school with marginal significance ( p = .08), with prevalence decreasing as grade increased.
Again, the results for total and recommended screen time in weekend days were largely in line with the one reported for weekdays (not shown in Table 4 ), although only borderline significant associations were found in the adjusted analyses for total screen time and single parent families (b = .43, 95%CI: −.05, .91, p = .08), and for recommended screen time and reconstituted families (OR = 1.89; 95%CI: .91, 3.93, p = .09).
In men, the interaction term between age and education was close to being statistically significant for high (the highest quintile) WHR ( P = 0.08) and low FFM ( P = 0.08), whereas in women, the effect modification by age was weaker.
Participants who were overweight showed a tendency toward irregular monitoring compared with those with normal weight, although this was marginally significant (OR = 2.04, 95% CI = 0.92–4.60, p = 0.081).
Additionally, while sleep quality showed a trend toward improvement (decreased by 0.57 points, 12.15%; p = 0.082), it did not reach statistical significance, and no significant interactions were observed for other physical fitness and body composition outcomes.
While the group-by-time interaction for sleep quality was not significant, a favorable trend toward within-group improvement was observed in the HIIT group (− 0.57 points, − 12.15%, p = 0.082, d = 0.270), whereas no such trend occurred in the control group (0.07 points, 1.28%, p = 0.892, d = 0.029).
approached significancep = 0.082
Food security predicted sustainable preferences (β = 0.097, 95% CI [0.045–0.149], p = 0.001), while the interaction term approached significance (β = 0.051, p = 0.082).
at the threshold of significancep = 0.082
The interaction between food security and nutrition literacy revealed a finding at the threshold of significance (β = 0.051, p = 0.082 ), indicating a potential moderating effect (Table 5 ).
The difference between men and women with type 1 diabetes was statistically almost significant ( p = 0.083 ).
The association between utilisation of SRH referral services and age was marginally significant ( P = 0.083).