borderline significancep = 0.098
τ i ≤ 0.89 (s) cutoff value showed borderline significance ( p = 0.098).
τ i ≤ 0.89 (s) cutoff value showed borderline significance ( p = 0.098).
Our data suggested a higher number of recurrences in the group with high expression of miR-24-1-5p but of borderline significance ( p = 0.098) ( Figure 2 ).
However, postoperative NPS was considered marginally significant as a prognostic factor for OS ( p = 0.098). 3.7.
In the multivariate Cox regression proportional hazard model, a strong trend could be observed for elevated S100 at baseline (HR 1.78, 95% CI 0.90–3.54, p = 0.098) but not for the high-CCL20 group (HR 1.46, 95% CI 0.77–2.75, p = 0.244) regarding OS ( Table 5 ).
A meta-analysis where the prior cohort study was excluded, showed a trend towards reduced risk of OC with tubal-ligation in BRCA 1 mutation carriers (odds ratio 0.69, p = 0.098), but not in BRCA 2 mutation carriers (odds ratio 0.73, p = 0.33), likely due to small number [ 42 ].
Though there were no significant differences between the outcomes of subgroups with or without EBRT, the mOS values showed a clear trend in favor of EBRT (673 vs. 517 days, p = 0.0983).
The distribution of single-station versus multi-station N2 disease showed a trend towards significance ( p = 0.099), with Group A having a higher proportion of single-station N2 disease (90%) compared to Group C (72%). 3.2.
A marginally significant decrease in plasma interleukin-6 levels was observed in the CgA − group ( p = 0.0995), while there was no change in the CgA + group ( p = 0.6398).
Six months after the end of the treatments, the proportions of Dialister in PS patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy tended to remain higher ( p = 0.1), while in PS patients of the neoadjuvant group, there were significant or near-significant increases in some PR-associated microbial signatures, i.e., Eggerthella ( p = 0.1) and Adlercreutzia ( p = 0.04) ( Figure S7 ).
Features such as the median intensity from the wavelet (H) filter, long run high gray level emphasis from the wavelet (H), indicating the presence of long, high-intensity runs in the image, and GLSZM small area emphasis from LoG sigma 3.0, a measure of the concentration of small bright regions in the filtered image, exhibited partial significance (0.05 < p < 0.1), suggesting mixed or context-dependent contributions to the models.
Factors showing at least borderline significance ( p < 0.1) in univariate Cox proportional hazards analyses for overall survival (OS) were included in subsequent multivariate analysis.
The model with the additional covariates showed marginal significance (at p < 0.10) for social participation ( p = 0.079).
Significant variables, those of borderline significance ( p < 0.1) and clinically relevant variables were included in the multivariate regression model.
We also decided to include in the multivariate Cox’s regression analysis those IIs that showed a trend for significance (a p -value < 0.1).
If the global test demonstrated a near-significant result ( p -value < 0.1), then post-hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison test was performed.
Multivariate Cox regression models were explored including ICI type and other covariates presenting a significant or a marginally significant effect ( p -value < 0.1) based on univariate Cox regression models.
Variables that achieved statistical significance ( p < 0.05) or those close to significance ( p < 0.1) by univariate analysis were subsequently included in the multivariate analysis.
Variables that achieved statistical significance ( p < 0.05) or those close to significance ( p < 0.1) by univariate analysis were subsequently included in the multivariate analysis.
In agreement with this finding, the imaging index virtually preserved its capability to predict the response to treatment in patients with the highest increase in PSA after Ra223 administration, as suggested by the almost significant p value ( p = 0.1 in each subgroup, see also Figure 4 ) and the emblematic example reported in Figure 5 . 4.
Variables showing a tendency toward statistical significance ( p < 0.1) in the univariable model were entered into the multivariable model.
Furthermore, the expression of some of the genes significantly or almost significantly changed ( t -test, p ≤ 0.10) following starvation, with biggest changes occurring in the expression of SNX18, HMGB1, Tp53inp2, and RICTOR ( Figure 8 B).
For example, four eyes demonstrated 20q gain and three eyes demonstrated 8p loss in the secondary enucleation group; these SCNAs were not seen in the primary enucleation group, and this difference approached significance for 20q gain ( p = 0.10).
There was a statistical trend favoring ATEs in patients with “extensive disease” (OR 5.3. p = 0.10) or elevated LDH (OR 3.4, p = 0.10), while no association was found with chemotherapy protocol (especially cisplatin vs. carboplatin, OR 2.12, p = 0.69), histology, or high blood pressure.
Statistical significance was set at p -value < 0.05, while statistical trend (marginal significance) was set at 0.05 < p -value < 0.1.
Tests were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***), p < 0.0001 (****) or marginally significant when 0.05 < p < 0.1.