Planned follow-up within-subjects contrasts indicated an approach towards significance for HF, F (1,15) = 3.305, p = 0.089, from the beginning to the middle of the relaxation protocol.
Excerpts
In the first case, the perceived success of the student movement moderates the effect of reported current participation of the students (quasi experimental condition) over their intentions of participating in both normative and non-normative actions, although in the former the effect is only marginally significant, F (2,375) = 2.44, p = 0.089, η p 2 = 0.014 and F (2,375) = 3.29, p = 0.038, η p 2 = 0.018, respectively.
There was a marginally significant interaction between consistency and priming in reaction times [ F (1, 30) = 3.09, p = 0.089], but most importantly, the three way interaction between group, consistency and priming was also significant [ F (1, 30) = 4.18, p = 0.050].
Additionally, we found a marginally significant interaction of cue validity and previous cue visibility, F (1, 25) = 3.13, p = 0.089.
showed a trendp = 0.09
Children in the 12-year-old group showed a trend toward a greater absolute change in CBF compared to adults ( M = 35.17 mL/100 mL/minx, SE = 3.30), p = 0.09.
For intensity ratings, the effect of facial expression type did not reach statistical significance [although it showed a trend: F (2,42) = 2.69, p = 0.09, η p 2 = 0.11].
approached significancep = 0.09
The interaction approached significance ( F (2, 54) = 2.37, p = 0.09, η p 2 = 0.08) ( Table 5 ).
When amusics were identified using the contour subtest of the MBEA, their performance in the low-pass filtered condition was still below that of controls (amusics mean = 62%, SD = 16%; controls mean = 70%, SD = 12%); however the difference was only marginally significant [ t (38) = 1.7, p = 0.09].
The analysis revealed a significant intercept, F (1, 16.07) = 7.37, p = 0.02, indicating above chance performance, and a marginally significant effect of inference, F (3, 9.26) = 2.88, p = 0.09.
showed a trendp = 0.09
The combined group showed a trend of improvement on TMT-A (combined vs. control, p = 0.09) while memory group did not.
However, we note that the difference in willingness for finger prick between the two groups is marginally significant, p = 0.09, yielding a larger effect size, r = 0.42 than willingness for taking strong medication, r = 0.29.
The mean reaction time in the test of visual rapid simultaneous processing was negatively correlated with the reading speed in both oral [ r = -0.29, p = 0.09, marginally significant] and silent [ r = -0.45, p = 0.001] modes, where shorter reaction time for visual rapid simultaneous processing corresponded to higher speed of reading.
a trend toward significancep = 0.09
The difference between Basque and Japanese showed a trend toward significance ( p = 0.09), with Basque participants having a higher number of IF responses than Japanese participants.
The main effect of gender was not significant, F (1, 73) = 1.87, p = 0.18, η 2 p = 0.03; however, the interaction between gender and age was marginally significant, F (3, 77) = 2.25, p = 0.09, η 2 p = 0.09.
showed a trendp = 0.09
Nevertheless, GOE's fluency showed a trend to significantly more improvement during the treatment phase than the baseline phase, t (4) = 1.59, p = 0.09 (see Figure 4A ).
Children showed a similar trend, although the coefficient for delta CV (β = −0.15) was only marginally significant ( p = 0.09).
Simple slope analyses (See Figure 1 ) indicated that perceived parent support was associated with risk-taking behaviors marginally significant at low levels of self-control ( b simple slope = −0.04, t = −1.68, p = 0.09), but the association was not significant statistically at high levels of self-control ( b simple slope = 0.03, t = 1.29, p = 0.20).
of marginal significancep = 0.09
A medium effect, albeit of marginal significance, in favor of the UT group immediately after the training was found for two far transfer tasks: story recall, F (1,39) = 3.09, p = 0.09, MSE = 11.04, η p 2 = 0.07, and RAPM, F (1,39) = 2.73, p = 0.10, MSE = 4.27, η p 2 = 0.07 ( Figure 5 ).
approached significancep < 0.09
The 3-way interaction approached significance, F (1, 13) = 3.40, p < 0.09, yet further analyses revealed that it resulted from non-significant trends in opposite directions for the two target-letter conditions, both p s >0.2 (see Figure 5 ).
This interaction was significant from 250 to 350 ms ( F = 3.5, p < 0.05) and marginally significant from 350 to 450 ms ( F = 2.9, p < 0.09).
approached significancep = 0.09
The relationship between interoceptive awareness and emotional involvement during reappraisal approached significance [β = -0.34, t (25) = -1.73, p = 0.09].
Moreover, the correlation coefficients of MEIV increased in the post-test of the empirical priming compared to the counterfactual condition, with a significance ( p < 0.01) appearing in the behavioral intentions of MEC and MEE and a marginal significance ( p = 0.09) in the MEIH.
Within the temporal measures, a nearly significant group effect was observed in the response time (β = -309.90, p = 0.09), while no group effect was observed in the initiation time (β = -309.90, p = 0.30) and in the motion time (β = -230.80, p = 0.13).
Post-hoc Tukey tests indicated the following pattern of findings in children's proportion of category-match choices: 5-year-old children made significantly more category-match choices than both 4-year-olds and 3-year-olds (both ps < 0.05), 4-year-old children also made more category-match choices than 3-year-old children but this difference was only marginally significant, p = 0.09.
showed a trendp = 0.09
Patients who used benzodiazepines (Bz.) regularly or occasionally showed a trend toward lesser reduction on the primary outcome of avoidance than the other patients in the study both pre-post (Bz. = 1.19, no Bz. = 1.79, p = 0.09) and pre-12 months FU (Bz. = 1.13, no Bz. = 1.64, p = 0.19), and no difference between CBT or TFT ( p = 0.80).