Excerpts

Household income significantly predicted increased levels of cooperation, with high-income individuals donating 84 p more than low-income individuals (β = 0.84 [0.09; 1.59], p < 0.05; Table S4 and Figure 2 ) People experienced a marginally significant increase in the feelings of sectarian threat during the riots, compared to before and after the riots (β = 0.25 [−0.03, 0.52], p < 0.1; Table S5 ).

These effects were marginally significant for the lowest capacity condition (i.e., Clear) vs. the −12 dB condition (mean = 18.7) [ t (142) = 1.65, p = 0.10].

Furthermore, when examining the relationship with the Type I criterion separately for absent responses and present responses ( Sherman et al., 2018 ), a positive relationship emerges between mean confidence for absent responses and c ( r = 0.25, p < 0.05), along with a strong trend toward a negative association between mean confidence for present responses and c ( r = −0.15, p = 0.10), thereby replicating Sherman et al.’s findings.

Memory performance was only a marginally significant covariate, F (1, 40) = 3.34, p < 0.10, and there was still a significant effect of label condition even when memory performance was included first in a stepwise linear regression, F (2, 40) = 8.75, p < 0.01, partial η 2 = 0.30.

The effect was slightly significant [ F (1,61) = 3.382, p < 0.1].

Marginally non-significant effects (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1) are reported, and p -values for post hoc tests conducted for between-subjects factors reflect results from Fisher’s LSD test.

We also tested by means of Welch two-sample t -tests whether male and female participants obtained significantly different scores on each scale: marginally significant differences due to participants sex emerged for ASI Hostile [men scored an average of 2.15 vs. an average of 1.65 for women, t (29.35) = 1.73, p < 0.1], whereas for the remaining scales no differences due to participants’ sex emerged [all t s < 1].

For Orbic muscle activation, the only finding that was approaching significance was that greater change in Orbic activity was associated with greater general NM (ß = 0.18, p < 0.10, R 2 = 0.03, F (1, 121) = 3.79, p = 0.054), indicating that those higher in general NM were incorrectly activating muscles around their eyes when intentionally mimicking a neutral face.

A few of these correlations were either marginally statistically significant ( p < 0.10) or not statistically significant (see Table 6 ).

However, the strength of this association was reduced and only marginally significant ( p < 0.10) when preference for the equity principle, gender, and academic unit were added to the equation.

More importantly, the interaction effect between the reward type and product customer satisfaction was marginally significant [ F (2,362) = 2.950, p < 0.1, η 2 = 0.016].

Minor injuries (Model 2) have also decreased by 25% in the peripheral districts of the city [although the coefficient is weakly significant ( p < 0.1)].

For employees with low construal level, the positive relationship between EO REO and voice behavior is marginally significant when challenge stressor is high ( Slope = 0.205, S.E. = 0.126, p < 0.1 ) and the positive relationship between EO REO and voice behavior is not significant when challenge stressor is low ( Slope = 0.109, S.E. = 0.128, p > 0.1 ).

Furthermore, the Session by Age group by Switching demand interaction F (1,168) = 4.49, MSE = 0.02, η 2 = 0.03, p = 0.04, as well as the Session by Age group by Maintenance demand interaction F (1,168) = 3.63, MSE = 0.02, η 2 = 0.02, p = 0.06 were at least marginally significant ( p < 0.10).

For second-born children, prediction of sibling age gap on maternal parenting stress was marginally significant (β = −0.12, p < 0.1).

Likewise, the differences between the experimental group and the Chilean study are marginally significant: t (183) = 1.09, p = 0.10, d = 0.21.

Finally, the total non-housing assets of a patient (T0ATOTN) is a marginally significant (P < 0.1) variable that has a negative correlation with the DV.

For units with low climate level and high strength the slope was negative and approached significance ( b = −0.37, p < 0.10).

For school-based involvement, however, mothers working non-standard hours had greater levels than those working standard hours ( b = 1.177), though the difference was marginally significant ( p < 0.1).

To examine learning condition differences (collapsed across age groups 3 ), a Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric test was conducted, revealing a slight trend toward a significant difference in the total number of questions asked between the learning conditions, X 2 (2) = 4.56, p = 0.10.

Yet, only marginally significant mediation effects were examined for Reading (Model 4 in Table 4 ) with students' school identification ( b = 7.15, p < 0.10) and their perceptions of school climate (indirect effect, b = 7.87, p < 0.10).

The result supports hypothesis 1a, whose direct negative effect is marginally significant ( β = −0.08, p < 0.10).

With regard to indirect relations, working memory as a foundational cognitive skill had only a marginally significant indirect relation with later reading comprehension via mental state language (β = 0.05, p < 0.10) and metacognitive knowledge (β = 0.05, p < 0.10).

Participants in the high-worry group selected the increasing option less often than expected by chance, although the difference was only marginally significant, t (27) = −1.95, p < 0.10.

No other main effect or interaction approached significance (all p -values > 0.1).