Excerpts

Marginally non-significant effects (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1) are reported, and p -values for post hoc tests conducted for between-subjects factors reflect results from Fisher’s LSD test.

Furthermore, when examining the relationship with the Type I criterion separately for absent responses and present responses ( Sherman et al., 2018 ), a positive relationship emerges between mean confidence for absent responses and c ( r = 0.25, p < 0.05), along with a strong trend toward a negative association between mean confidence for present responses and c ( r = −0.15, p = 0.10), thereby replicating Sherman et al.’s findings.

Of the low-level visual variables, color similarity (brightness histograms across the various color channels) was significant in the recognition task, and vertical spectral amplitude approached significance on the location task ( p < 0.1).

The effect was slightly significant [ F (1,61) = 3.382, p < 0.1].

Significant differences ( p < 0.05) were found on the face-name task, ALT, word updating task and backward digit span, and marginally significant difference ( p < 0.1) was found on the picture updating task.

For school-based involvement, however, mothers working non-standard hours had greater levels than those working standard hours ( b = 1.177), though the difference was marginally significant ( p < 0.1).

For units with low climate level and high strength the slope was negative and approached significance ( b = −0.37, p < 0.10).

The overall CSE was only marginally significant (previous × current trial congruency interaction: F [1, 9] = 3.3, p = 0.10), with numerically smaller conflict scores following incongruent (mean = 80 ms) than congruent trials (mean = 60 ms) (see Figure 3 A).

No significant effects of interest were found in the 2 × 2 × 2 analysis, although three effects (Veracity; Region; three-way interaction) were marginally significant, p < 0.10.

Employee participation shows a high correlation with works council participation ( r = 0.47, p < 0.01) and – different from the works council participation – a weakly significant correlation with knowledge growth ( r = 0.29, p < 0.10 versus r = 0.02).

Marginally significant interactions ( p < 0.1) were explored with pairwise comparisons for the frontal and parietal electrode sites separately, with Bonferroni correction to correct for multiple comparisons.

Compared to those with a dominant hierarchical culture, local governments with a dominant egalitarian culture has a higher level of equal public participation but only at a marginal significance level (MD = 0.52, p < 0.1) and have no difference in authentic public participation.

Results show that when we entered proactive personality, career adaptability and their interaction item into the regression model, proactive personality had a significant positive effect on performance ( B = 0.32, p < 0.001), whereas the effect of career adaptability on performance is marginally significant ( B = 0.122, p = 0.10).

However, the strength of this association was reduced and only marginally significant ( p < 0.10) when preference for the equity principle, gender, and academic unit were added to the equation.

There was a marginally significant main effect of BIS affect, b = 0.17, SE = 0.10, β = 0.32, t (65) = 1.69, p < 0.10, all other p s > 0.22.

In order to streamline the model and focus on the most meaningful relationships, only significant and near-significant (i.e., 0.05 < p < 0.10) effects from Model 1 in Model 2 were retained (see Figure 2 ).

We report below eye-tracking measures presenting statistically significant fixed effects of typicality, pronoun , and typicality*pronoun ( p < 0.05), and corresponding significant or marginally significant ( p < 0.1) results of contrast analyses, separated for measure.

Independent-samples t -tests revealed that such differences reached marginal significance for total creative potential as well as the fluency and originality dimensions ( p < 0.1).

There was a marginally significant effect on the attention/impulsivity subscale of the Assessor Report ( b =0.07, S.E. =0.04, p< 0.10).

Importantly, differences in subjective effort only approached significance ( p = 0.10; with the TI climate group reporting greater exertion), highlighting how critical it is to have multiple assessments that incorporate both objective and subjective measures.

However, correlations of ethos ratings with national character stereotypes were significant and substantial (0.46–0.61) for three of the cultures, and showed a trend ( r = 0.32, p < 0.10) for Russia.

To determine the significance of effects, we adhered to traditional significance levels of p <0.05 and also note marginal significance at p <0.10.

0.39) was marginally significant ( p < 0.10).

There was a marginally significant improvement [ M = 3.56, SD = 0.86, p < 0.1] in the therapists' perceptions in terms of therapeutic openness/involvement of the father by comparison to control group A.

Conservation) was only marginally significant ( p < 0.1, t = 1.7).