Barely Significant

Excerpts

6,422 sentences · 1 filter applied

Although ASQE is frequently used in research on the quality of life in strabismus, of which limitations include being applicable only to children aged 6–12, failing to fully cover infants and older children and adolescents, especially for intermittent exotropia, it is not specifically targeting and may be significant sensitivity (false positives) in the assessment ( Felius et al., 2007 ; Glasman et al., 2013 ; Hatt et al., 2019 ; Leske et al., 2021 ; Wang et al., 2014 ).
After correction for multiple testing, one of the t -tests in each of the nine topographic clusters turned out significant [in the right central cluster with t (34) = −3.06, p adj = 0.036, r = 0.46], one marginally significant [in the right posterior cluster with t (34) = −2.86, p adj = 0.056, r = 0.44], and four more neighboring clusters still showed trends [left anterior cluster with t (34) = −2.42, p adj = 0.11, r = 0.38, mid anterior cluster with t (34) = −2.57, p adj = 0.09, r = 0.4, right anterior cluster with t (34) = −2.32, p adj = 0.11, r = 0.37, and mid central cluster with t (34) = −2.74, p adj = 0.07, r = 0.43], always with a larger negativity for sublexically negative high-arousing words.
highly significantqualifiedgold
In parallel, the authors did not mention, probably for publication deadline reasons, the results of a recent meta-analysis comprising 7 medium/high quality studies that revealed a highly significant increase in prevalence of cerebral hyperintense spots found with MRI in 98 out of 279 healthy divers (mainly professional) compared to 44 out of 232 non-diver controls (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.71–4.39, p < 0.001; Connolly and Lee, 2015 ).
Regarding perceptions of future career relevance to AI, those who saw a connection ( M = 3.357, SD = 0.688) had slightly higher AI anxiety than those who did not ( M = 3.233, SD = 0.682), but this difference was not statistically significant ( t = −1.791, p = 0.075), showing only a marginal trend. 4.5.
The three-way interactions between the chronic promotion, the chronic prevention, and the financial choice category [ F (1.68, 905.15) = 2.56, p < 0.07, η 2 = 0.01], as well as between the situational motivation, the chronic prevention, and the financial choice category [ F (1.68, 905.15) = 2.46, p < 0.08, η 2 = 0.01] showed a tendency toward significance.