Excerpts

These models are largely characterized by less employment stability, i.e., an erosion of permanent employment coupled with a strong trend toward temporary employment.

= 0.035) but not BT although his data showed a trend in the same direction.

Finally, there was a statistical trend for a group difference on the resolvable trials that was reminiscent of the significant differences we had observed before with a spatial probe and abstract stimuli (letters in locations, Experiment 2 in Harkin and Kessler, 2011 ).

In contrast, valence category [ W (1) = 7.28, p = 0.007], spatial target [ W (7) = 70.09, p < 0.001], and their interaction W (7) = 131.24, p < 0.001, were highly significant.

The MGA two-tailed p -value for inter-group difference equaled 0.062, reflecting a marginal trend approaching significance.

The marginal p -value of 0.062 suggests a near-significant upward trend with cumulative usage.

Note, however, that with b = -0.58, SE = 0.35, OR = 0.56, p = 0.093, the interaction effect is only marginally significant in Model 1 of the regression analysis.

Even though this p -value is only marginally significant, with regard to our rather small number of participants, we decided to calculate all planned post hoc contrasts in order to examine our hypothesis.

Recent searches for [1, 1] restricted T-patterns in text as occurrences of letters show that some words cannot be detected for this reason as, for example, some words include no significant pairs of letters, while, as a whole, they are highly significant T-patterns and would thus be detectable with higher-order trees.

Moreover, the predicted indirect effect was marginally significant, β = 0.01, CI [−0.002,0.03].

The predicted indirect effect of indispensability on commitment via prototypicality and identification was not significant at low status, but it approached significance closely, β = 0.02, CI [−0.002,0.06], while it was far from being significant, and not even in the same direction, at high-status ( Table 4 ).

Brain Connectivity in Dyslexia A significant trend in cognitive neuroscience today is the brain connectivity approach, which explores the functional or structural connectivity patterns of brain regions that support cognitive or linguistic processing.

( 2010 ) found slight improvements in the initiate scale of the BRIEF—Teacher Form, even though these only approached significance.

While slow occipital spindle density correlated positively with task improvement, fast occipital spindle density showed a trend toward the opposite.

Notably, the age of onset of stroke is continuously shifting earlier, with a marked trend toward younger populations.

The large t -value and highly significant p -value confirm the robustness and statistical significance of this relationship.

Although this was not included in our hypotheses, it is worth mentioning because it demonstrates a strong trend toward improvement in leaders’ performance over time, as perceived by their employees.

(6) Neither the main effect of List nor any of its interactions with the other factors approached significance.

After treatment termination, however, Pam’s scores on the outcome measures showed a decreasing trend and 2 years after treatment ended clinical significant improvement was achieved on the BDI-II (RCI = −4.61, <−1.96, p < 0.05).

After controlling for gender, age, age squared, education, Communist Party membership, marital status, log household income, and region fixed effects, the coefficient of political participation is 0.121 and remains highly significant at the 1% level.

Results We started with looking for a trend in the speed time series (by Kendall’s non-parametric rank correlation coefficient) and confirmed that almost 80% of the 280 marathoners (77%) had a decreasing trend in speed data.

3.2.4 Summary of narrative findings Across the three comparator categories, combined treatment (rTMS + CBT/iCBT/MBCT) generally showed a trend toward better outcomes than each single-treatment approach.

Trust was strongly associated with lower negative affect (| r |s > 0.44, p s < 0.01) and moderately associated with greater positive affect at a marginal significance level (| r |s > 0.28, p s < 0.09). 3.2.

For HNR, there was a negative trend for the ND group relative to the ASD group, but the credible interval included zero (see Table 4 ).

The significance level was set at α ≤ 0.05, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant and p < 0.01 considered highly significant.