Barely Significant

Excerpts

6,422 sentences · 1 filter applied

Focusing on the quality of the options, there was neither a significant difference in the quality of the first choice between the groups, F (3, 69) = 0.74, p = 0.53, f = 0.18, 1−β = 0.21, nor in the quality of the final choice between the groups, F (3, 69) = 2.25, p = 0.09, f = 0.31, 1−β = 0.57, although in this latter case, the effect size was of moderate strength and the alpha value was approaching significance.
The effect size reported for visuo-motor recalibration (23 ms here; 30–44 ms in Stetson et al., 2006 ; Heron et al., 2009 ; Sugano et al., 2010 ) is much larger than that reported for visuo-tactile only recalibration (12.5 ms; Keetels and Vroomen, 2008 ) or for visuo-tactile-proprioceptive recalibration (16 ms; Stetson et al., 2006 ; effect approaching significance).
Footnotes 1 When using SRep 1 as reference for online R-E learning progress (SRep1 – SRep2, Srep1 – SRep3, etc...), there was an overall trend for negative correlations with the RE compatibility effect but none of them reached significance (neither for RTs nor for errors). 2 This holds under the assumption that factor Y and factor X impact RT along different timelines – otherwise factor X impact on performance slope should have a similar
Early markers of ongoing action-effect learning.
Front Psychol · 2012 · PMC3506999