Excerpts

The results show a marginally significant negative effect of health literacy on beliefs in myths (a1: β = −0.064, p = 0.051, CI [−0.128, 0.000]).

However, reading span correlated positively with performance accuracy in nonnative speakers ( r = 0.396, p = 0.022) but not in native speakers ( r = −0.023, p = 0.906); the difference of these correlations was a strong trend ( z = −1.632; p = 0.051).

The difference between major and minor music conditions was marginally significant ( p = 0.051).

A main effect of congruency was found, F (1,57) = 102.6, MSE = 64,955, p < 0.001, a marginally significant effect was found for group, F (2,57) = 2.64, MSE = 37,202, p = 0.051, and no significant interaction effect was found, F < 1.

The results revealed that the main effect of time on BMI was nearly significant [ F (1,50) = 3.998, p = 0.051, η 2 p = 0.074], indicating a trend of change in BMI over time.

Indirect connections from the STP were also significantly greater in the water condition with the insula ( p = 0.021), the ACC ( p = 0.017), the hippocampus ( p = 0.027), and marginally significant with the amygdala ( p = 0.051).

There was a marginally significant effect of “time period” on general stress scores: F (1.87,216.49) = 3.10, p = 0.051.

Another multiple regression on the total number of blocks to reach the learning criterion against both distances led to a nearly significant standardized coefficient for the Within-Cluster Distance (β = 0.269, p = 0.051), ending up with a global non-significant fit [ F (2,51) = 2.28, NS].

The repeated-measures ANOVA with the within-subject factor Time and the between-subject factor Group approached significance with a medium effect size for the factor Group [ F (1,39) = 4.051; p = 0.051; η p 2 = 0.094 ] and a non-significant effect with a small effect size for the factor Time [ F (1,39) = 0.886; p = 0.352; η p 2 = 0.022 ].

As for the balanced trials, group effect was marginally significant, F (1,38) = 4.07, p = 0.051, η 2 p = 0.09 and math anxiety did not interact with number of digits ( p = 0.75).

The difference between the first and second transfer phases approached significance (Mean Difference = −0.456, p = 0.051), with a Cohen’s d of-1.813, reflecting a large effect size but indicating that this difference was less consistent or reliable compared to the other comparisons ( Table 2 ) ( Figure 5 ). 5 Discussion The present study investigated the impact of implicit and explicit learning on motor task performance across three sessions.

Gender showed a marginally significant effect ( B = 0.392, p = 0.051 ), while teaching experience ( B = 0.125, p < 0.10 ) and AI usage level ( B = 0.070, p < 0.10 ) also exerted marginally significant influences on voice behavior.

For men, two-way ANOVA analysis did not show clearly significant results between PRE and POST salivary OXT level, in either the “social positive” vs “social negative” sample [ F (1, 7) = 5.564, p = 0.051] ( Supplementary Figure S5B ), or in the “social positive” vs “non-social” sample [ F (1, 21) = 0.029, p = 0.865] ( Supplementary Figure S5D ).

Further, the tendency for men to appraise their voice experience as more benevolent than women approached significance [ t (111.89) = 1.96, p = 0.051].

In the analyses of error rate, only the main effect of Cue Type approached significance ( F 1 , 50 = 3.99; p = 0.051, η 2 p = 0.07), indicating that participants made slightly more errors on the arrow (4%) than on the gaze condition (3.3%).

Interestingly, the difference for the “Alcohol-Sleep” cluster approached significance after adjustment (Estimate = −0.265, p = 0.051).

Relatedness had a near-significant effect on plausibility ( B = 0.09, p = 0.051).

However, a chi-squared test examining the distribution of low-accuracy performers (<65%) across bilinguals and monolinguals was marginally significant, Chi-Squared ( df = 1) = 3.8, p = 0.051, suggesting different distributions of lower learning outcomes in the bilinguals vs. monolinguals (see Participants Section).

The interaction between number format and CRI [ F (1,116) = 0.85, p = 0.359, ηp2 = 0.01] and between number format and education [ F (1,116) = 0.41, p = 0.526, ηp2 = 0.00] did not reach significance, while the interaction between number format and age was marginally non-significant [ F (1,116) = 3.90, p = 0.051, ηp2 = 0.03].

The effect of mothers’ share of child care on children’s communal occupational aspirations was not moderated by child gender ( p = 0.885), but the interaction between mothers’ share of child care and child age approached significance ( p = 0.051) 8 .

All measures assessing the same ability were significantly positively intercorrelated, except for the linguistic accuracy scores (although the correlation between the verbal fluency and lexical decision task was marginally significant: p = 0.051, r = 0.20), linguistic speed scores (for which the correlation was negative), and the flanker and Simon inhibition scores.

The likelihood ratio test comparing the full and null model revealed that trial had a marginally non-significant effect (χ 2 = 5.943, df = 2, p = 0.051), and attentiveness did not have a significant effect (χ 2 = 2.884, df = 1, p = 0.089) on the elephants' choice to approach the cooperative partner.

A T-test was performed, finding with marginal significance longer RTs for congruent ( M = 2.331 s, SD = 0.752) compared to incongruent ( M = 2.041 s, SD = 0.471) trials, t (31) = -2.03, p = 0.051.

Also the effect of Length almost reached significance, F (1, 18) = 4.372, p = 0.051, η 2 = 0.195, but its interaction with Phonological risk did not, p = 0.327.

For the correct score in the open experiment the difference was close to significance, F (2, 41) = 3.20, p = 0.051.