Excerpts

The group difference on the measure of word decoding approached significance ( U = 50.0, p = 0.055).

When symbolic responses from the two Single conditions were summed and compared to these responses from the two Multiple conditions, a paired t -test revealed a borderline significant difference, t (15) = 2.1, p = 0.055, d = 0.42 (Multiple > Single).

With respect to target identification rates for the 7–13 condition, the correlation between b and the ELS for the practiced positions showed an increasing trend that peaked at the 3-Day condition, r (11) = 0.54, p = 0.055.

Adding the quadratic estimation yield marginally significant increment in the association, t (57) = 1.96, p = 0.055, boosting the β to 0.48 and the R 2 to 0.23 (see Figure 1 ).

This model was marginally significant ( F 4, 39 = 2.54, p = 0.055, model fit: AICc = 737.16; see also Table 3 ).

A computation of Tukey HSD (Tukey Honest Significant Differences, R function: TukeyHSD()) for performing multiple pairwise-comparison between the means of developmental groups found a significant difference in tokens ( p < 0.001) and types ( p < 0.001) between the Prelexical and the Advanced-Lexical group, a marginally significant difference in tokens ( p = 0.055) but not in types ( p = 0.48) between the Prelexical and the Early-Lexical group, and no significant difference in tokens ( p = 0.13) but in types ( p < 0.05) between Early-Lexical and Advanced-Lexical group.

We found a marginally significant task type × electrode × group interaction effect, F (3, 117) = 2.62, p = 0.055, η 2 = 0.06.

There was a marginally significant decrease in the use of Tastebreakers after the return to campus, F (1,268) = 3.71, p = 0.055, η 2 = 0.014 and a significant increase in the use of On Repeat, F (1,268) = 5.09, p = 0.025, η 2 = 0.019.

Task accuracy narrowly missed statistical significance across sessions ( p = 0.055), likely due to heterogeneity in individual response patterns and the limited sample size, which reduced statistical power to detect modest, clinically meaningful effects.

With regard to eating behavior, the results showed that those who responded reported almost significant ( U = 96.5, p = 0.055) higher levels of goal achievement than those who did not respond.

Simple slope analysis revealed that in the high social norms group, the effect of egoistic motivation on participation behavior was marginally significant (simple slope = 0.404, SE = 0.211, t = 1.918, p = 0.055), whereas in the low social norms group, the effect was not significant (simple slope = 0.206, SE = 0.149, t = 1.380, p = 0.168).

Regarding the frequency of traumatic actions, time had a marginally significant main effect [ F (2,28) = 3.215, p = 0.055, η 2 = 0.187].

There was a marginally significant interaction between Trial type and Simon score ( t = 1.92, p = 0.055), suggesting a trend that the higher Simon scores showed the greater mixing costs.

Simple main effect analyses demonstrated that somatic anxiety increased from the pre- to the pressure test and was significant for the contraction group ( p < 0.001) and marginally significant for the no-contraction group ( p = 0.055).

However, the interaction was only marginally significant, F (1, 66) = 3.80, p = 0.055.

Repeat Measurement Analysis of Variance of 2 (Gender: Male, Female) × 2 (Social Distance: Itimacy, Strangeness) × 2 (Symmetry of Punishments: Symmetric Punishment, Asymmetric Punishment) Performed for Defection Rate The results of repeated measures ANOVA showed that the main effect of gender was nearly significant, with F (1,77) = 3.784, P = 0.055, η p 2 = 0.047, and observed power = 0.384, indicating that the non-cooperation rate of men (0.374) was slightly lower than that of women (0.424).

Additionally, there were significant two-way interactions between valence and context ( F (2,456) = 103.24, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.312), approximately significant two-way interactions between word class and context ( F (1,228) = 3.73, p = 0.055, η 2 = 0.016), and significant two-way interactions between valence and word class ( F (2,246) = 45.65, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.167).

Indeed, we did see that concurrent load increased partner-duplications at generation, consistent with its demonstrated effect on working memory ( Quinn and Ralston, 1986 ; Smyth and Pendleton, 1989 ; Lawrence et al., 2001 ; Can et al., 2017 ), and decreased correct recall of partner actions [this simple effect was marginally significant, F (2,34) = 3.17, MSe = 2.33, p = 0.055, η p 2 = 0.157].

However, the main effect for the Cost to Opponent approached significance [ F (1,148) = 3.72, p = 0.056, η p 2 = 0.025]—in that participants may have reported overall greater success in their predictions under the Low Cost condition ( M = 12.69) than under the High Cost condition ( M = 11.70).

Only the correlation between item memory for phonological similar items and non-word reading was marginally significant, r = -0.254, p = 0.056, N = 57, and even this association should be interpreted with a degree of caution given the fact that Table 2 contains 24 separate correlations.

Memory condition exhibited near-significant trend toward predicting lower sadness recovery, b = −1.9007, p = 0.056, 95% CI [−3.8529, 0.0516].

600–1,000 ms Analyses of this time window indicated the main effect of electrode sites was approaching significance [ F (2,36) = 3.134, p = 0.056, η p 2 = 0.148], with the largest LPC amplitude in parietal Pz (3.6 μV), significantly larger than those in frontal Fz (2.6 μV, p < 0.05) and central Cz (2.6 μV, p < 0.05).

The expected Target × Dimension × Condition interaction was marginally significant, F (1,116) = 3.72, p = 0.056, η 2 = 0.03.

There was also a nearly statistically significant linear trend ( p = 0.056) showing a higher prevalence of alexithymic in single patients compared to patients with partner and separated/divorced/widow ( Table 1 ).

However this was mitigated by a marginally significant interaction by group [group × change, F (1, 30) = 3.969, p = 0.056], such that this effect was observed in tone speakers ( p < 0.001) but not in the control group ( p = 0.215).