The main effect of emotional valence approached significance [ β = 0.107, t = 1.913, p = 0.056, 95% CI = (−0.003, 0.217)], suggesting a marginal tendency for reaction times to differ between positive and negative words.
GPA was found to have a nearly significant influence on PAL (Estimate = −17.280, SE = 8.413, t = −2.054, p -value = 0.056). 3.8 Mean weekday and weekend steps The analysis of mean weekday steps revealed a significant effect of learning environment type (Online: Estimate = 750.630, SE = 374.150, t = 2.006, p -value = 0.050), but the intercept was not significant (estimate = 5065.490, SE = 3550.890, t = 1.427, p -value = 0.172).
The language by length by age interaction approached significance [ F (3, 735) = 2.53, p = 0.056]: there was an effect of length in younger children of both languages (mean of increase for letter = 10.1 and 5.1% for English and Italian, respectively); among older children, the effect of length was present for English, but not Italian, children (4.0 and 0.3%, respectively).
However, a marginally significant interaction between Deviant type and Group was yielded, F (1,28) = 3.962, p = 0.056.
A repeated measures ANOVA in which site (SMG, AG), TMS condition (no TMS, TMS), and trial type (illusion, double flash) were within subject factors revealed a significant main effect of trial type [ F (1, 8) = 13.655, p = 0.006] and a strong trend toward significant interaction between TMS condition and site [ F (1, 8) = 4.994, p = 0.056].
The curvature of the LOIC was marginally significant [a4 = 0.14, 95% CI (−0.004, 0.277), p = 0.056], suggesting that whether adolescents or parents hold high educational expectations is related to better parent–child relationships as reported by parents (see Figure 2B ).
The main effect of video-based absolute accuracy was marginally significant ( β = −0.52, SE = 0.27, t = −1.94, and p = 0.056), indicating that larger absolute accuracy seemed to be associated with poorer audiovisual comprehension performance.
Additionally, the interaction effect between emotionality and word type was marginally significant, F (1, 35) = 3.913, p = 0.056, η 2 = 0.101.
However, there were no significant differences between groups [χ 2 (1) < 1, p = 0.879], and the interaction just missed significance [χ 2 (1) = 3.6, p = 0.056].
Psychopathy In the German male sample, overall emotion recognition ability showed a marginally significant interaction effect with psychopathy in predicting emotionally manipulative tactics [ B = 1.57, SE = 0.81, F (1,61) = 3.80, Δ R 2 = 0.04, p = 0.056, 95% CI (−0.04; 3.18)].
While the delayed effects of MFSS on school adjustment only reached marginally significant statistical level from MFSS at wave 3 ( p = 0.056), its concurrent effects of wave 5 and 6 were found to be significant (βs = 0.10, p s < 0.001).
With regard to brand recall , the mediation analyses showed a marginally significant direct effect of the disclosure on brand recall ( b = 1.72, SE = 0.90, p = 0.056).
When the data in the IRLP and IRLV conditions were analyzed (removing the data from the REG condition), however, the priming advantage for morphological over orthographic primes was not quite statistically significant, F (1, 2801.7) = 3.66 , p = 0.056.
Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons revealed a significant jump in accuracy from the 33% intensity condition to the 50% intensity condition ( p < 0.001) and a marginally significant jump from the 50% intensity condition to the 67% intensity condition ( p = 0.056).
We find the effect is borderline significant ( p = 0.056).
(3) Regression analysis to test the effect of visuospatial WM on error rate learning slope while controlling for math anxiety (path b) was only marginally significant, R 2 = 0.23, F (2,22) = 3.30, p = 0.056 (cf.
The interaction effect between input mode and text difficulty was marginally significant, F (1, 58) = 3.81, p = 0.056, indicating that in general, insertions made by the dictation group were more sensitive to text difficulty than those made by the typing group. 4.3.2.
Additionally, higher levels of agreeableness were uniquely associated with stronger revenge motivations toward the self, even though this agreeableness/revenge relationship was only marginally significant at the level of bivariate correlations ( r = 0.22, p = 0.056, Table 5 ).
Similarly to the first eight-item model, this seven-item model was rejected because its chi-square value was nearly significant [ x 2 (11) = 19.270, p = 0.056; x 2 /df = 1.751].
Interestingly, the interaction between voice category and gender approached significance [ F (4.4,727.8) = 2.2, p = 0.056, η 2 = 0.004] and would have suggested that the resistance of TRANS listeners occurred more toward actors on the extremities of the human range such as basses and sopranos than toward categories in the middle.
The correlation between chronological age and right-hand use in the grasp-to-construct task approached significance ( r = 0.16; p = 0.056).
Furthermore, a marginally significant group × congruency interaction was evident [ F (1,55) = 3.82, p = 0.056, η 2 = 0.065].
There was a trend toward significance for the instruction conditions [ F (2,43) = 3.09, p = 0.056; η 2 = 0.126] but no interaction of both factors ( p > 0.485).
The expected Target × Dimension × Condition interaction was marginally significant, F (1,116) = 3.72, p = 0.056, η 2 = 0.03.
Memory condition exhibited near-significant trend toward predicting lower sadness recovery, b = −1.9007, p = 0.056, 95% CI [−3.8529, 0.0516].