At 30 min, an almost significant difference was only found for the at-rest measurement ( p = 0.05, chi-squared). 3.4.
Excerpts
Lastly, consumption of cereal most or all days was protective of asthma (OR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.45–0.99), although borderline significant ( p = 0.05).
There was a weakly significant interaction between time and MPSS ( p = 0.05) ( Table 4 ).
After the formal implementation of the reform, DIT in Dingyuan County changed significantly and showed an increasing trend (0.24, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.45, p -value < 0.05).
These values, when compared with the mean of the control, showed that they are highly significant ( p ≤ 0.05), as shown in Figure 10 .
borderline significancep = 0.05
In this same model, census tracts composed of a high percentage (>50%) of lower-middle class residents ($22,500–$55,000 household income) had more TRI facilities than more affluent tracts (borderline significance p = 0.05).
of borderline significancep = 0.050
Tax by poverty was of borderline significance in this model (Coeff = 0.02, 95% CI: −0.00, 0.04, p = 0.050).
A borderline significant interaction was also found for KTK single-lever jumps (F = 4.1, p = 0.05).
There was a marginally significant association between gender and the closeness to which respondents followed news about heat waves ( p = 0.05), with women (62.0%) more likely to follow “Very closely” news about heat waves than men. 3.4.
Additionally, a Kruskal–Wallis test considering the different levels confirmed these differences as highly significant ( p < 0.05).
variegatus showed a highly significant correlation with DFS ( r = −0.36 and r = 0.29, respectively, P < 0.05).
For example, projects that were accompanied with mandatory fortification had a higher level (approaching significance at the p = 0.05 level) of perceived success among respondents than voluntary projects (data not shown).
Highly significant statistical correlations (R > 0.52, p < 0.05) were observed among all elements, except for As-Cr and As-Cu in soil samples ( Figure 2 ).
approached significancep = 0.05
The association between parent-specific WBT and greater depressive symptoms approached significance (F(1,116) = 3.85, p = 0.05).
tendency towards significancep = 0.050
With a tendency towards significance, music teachers showed higher odds of being anxious compared to non-music teachers (OR 1.34, p = 0.050).
Thus, we obtained moderately significant effect sizes in reduced sense of accomplishment ( d = −0.74, SE = 0.31, p < 0.05).
In the EA meta-analysis of SNP-by-anger interactions for the C10orf107 region, no single SNPs were measured in at least two cohorts and had at least a nominally significant p -value for the interaction with anger ( p < 0.05).
Adding disability did not significantly add to the prediction of perspectives on DL ( F (2, 338) = 1.88, ns), whereas entering self-image accounted for an additional marginally significant 1.8% of the variance in students’ perspectives on DL ( F (3, 337) = 3.11, p = 0.05, F -change = 5.53, p < 0.05).
showed a trendp ≥ 0.05
Conditions that showed a trend ( p ≥ 0.05 and p < 0.1) of sustaining breastfeeding were a history of non-obstetric complications, initiation of prenatal care in the second trimester (compared to not having prenatal care), and receiving BMSs and maternal breast milk as food upon leaving the hospital (compared to receiving BMSs only).
(2018) [ 19 ] in China reported a borderline significant association between lower annual household income and root caries in the 35–44-year-old age group (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.93–1.00, p = 0.05).
There was an increasing trend in UI prevalence with age in both sexes (both p < 0.05; Table 2 ).
approached significancep = 0.050
SFAL-WP and SFAL-RB Coverage In the SFAL-WP and SFAL-RB model ( Table 2 , Model 4), the interaction term for tax and poverty approached significance (Coeff = 0.02, 95% CI: −0.00, 0.04; p = 0.050), suggesting that the relationship between tax and smoking may differ by poverty.
Post hoc analysis revealed a borderline significant decrease in plasma CXCL5 levels from baseline to 6-months (−440.86 pg/mL, 95% CI = −799.79 to −81.93, p = 0.05) in the waitlist control group ( Figure 2 d).
The direct relation between spirituality and instrumental cyberaggression is only significant for the college sample (β = −0.05, p < 0.001), and between spirituality and reactive cyberaggression is significant for the college sample (β = −0.05, p < 0.001) and almost significant for middle school and high school samples (β = −0.22, p = 0.05; β = 0.07, p = 0.06).
showed a trendp < 0.05
BDI subscale C showed a trend toward a shorter decrease in the WNS 2.4 g group than that in the placebo group ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 4 ).