Excerpts

Participants who gardened had lower mean (5.1) and median (4) anxiety scores than non-gardeners (6.04; 6), but these findings were only marginally significant for mean scores ( p = 0.06) and not significant for median scores ( Table 1 ).

77.7%, p = 0.02), whereas perceived severity was only marginally significant (91.1% vs. 78.5%, p = 0.06).

For the person with stroke, the results indicated a marginally non-significant time effect for improvements in depressive symptoms (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.78, F(2, 23) = 3.23, p = 0.06).

However, there was near significance ( p < 0.06) for PROMIS-D-SF scores of the individual with stroke at T1 predicting PROMIS-D-SF scores of the care partner at T3, with higher scores for individuals with stroke at T1 predicting lower care partner scores at T3.

When exploring within-group correlations, depressed mothers continued to show no correlation between perceived and observed interaction quality, r (43) = −0.13, p = 0.40, while the correlation for mothers in the control group approached significance in the expected direction r (24) = −0.38, p = 0.06 (higher reported dysfunctional interaction associated with lower dyadic interaction quality). 3.4.

Overall, however, the effect sizes were smaller and the association between total physical activity and self-regulation was not quite statistically significant (B = 0.18, SE = 0.10, p = 0.06) ( Table 2 ). 3.3.

Authoritative parenting practice showed a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.06) by adolescent sex, with a higher authoritative score among parents of boys.

Pinch strength As the forest plot in Figure 9 shows, iontophoresis showed a trend to be less effective than phonophoresis in improving pinch strength, but the pooled results did not indicate differences between interventions (MD = −2.05 ( p = 0.06); 95% CI (−4.39 to 0.29); I 2 = 0% and Tau 2 = 0).

As well, full-time student status yielded significantly better scores in 2017 ( p < 0.001), and nearly significant ( p = 0.06) in 2022.

However, when measuring differences in the CHO intake between genders in each climbing level, marginally significant differences were found in the intermediate ( p = 0.06; Z = −1.88) and the elite ( p = 0.06; Z = −1.88) group, with no significance in the advanced group ( p = 0.13; Z = −1.50) The dietary intake of macro and micronutrients of male and female climbers on different climbing levels is presented in Table 4 .

Although the variation in practice across grades was only marginally significant ( p = 0.06), Grade 9 learners reported the highest level of hygiene practice (M = 0.54), indicating a possible trend.

The data for Got2 were less significant and only a decreasing trend ( p = 0.06) was observed between the Ovx and Ovx+E2 replacement groups ( Figure 3 ).

Noteworthily, a negative association (although only marginally significant, p = 0.06) was identified between upstream wetlands and geometric mean concentrations of E. coli for all sampling events.

Moreover, episodes with higher emotional intensity were recalled with more clarity at the one-month post-assessment, whereas a close-to-significant trend was observed at one-week follow-up ( r = 0.225, p = 0.06).

VAS Wellbeing Wellbeing scores did not significantly change between any paired time point for the WBC group, although the overall time effect approached significance ( p = 0.06).

Anxiety was also positively correlated with intent to comply, but this correlation was only marginally significant (b = 0.20, SE = 0.10, p < 0.06).

For each of these outcome measures, no significant effect of the overall time variable was seen for the whole study period, except for a marginally significant decrease in total treatment contacts ( p = 0.06) over time.

Marginally significant increases (tendency) ( p = 0.060) were observed for task-approach goals.

Being “not at all” anxious was a marginally significant predictor of weight loss (B = 0.83, p = 0.06).

However, the indirect path father’s NPR to child’s RED to child’s learning difficulties to child academic performance only narrowly missed significance (path a1 *b1*b3, b = 0.05 SE = 0.03, p = 0.06, CI (−0.002, 0.13)).

The addition of transitivity and the out-degree in models 2 and 3 each approached significance at p < 0.06.

In the comparison between the footballers and control groups, the statistically significant differences were found in the following variables: in the BMI (Mann–Whitney = 512.5, p < 0.05), being higher in the footballer than in control condition with a moderate to high effect size, Cohen’s d = 0.65 (r = 0.31); in Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Global score) (Mann–Whitney = 492, p < 0.00), being higher in the footballer than in the control condition with a very high effect size, Cohen’s d = 2.3 (r = 0.75) and marginally significant in the Positive subscale (Mann-Whitney = 607, p = 0.06), being higher in the footballer than in control condition and there was a small to moderate to high effect size, Cohen’s d = 0.48 (r = 0.23); and in the Subscale 1 of the CAP (Mann–Whitney = 547, p < 0.05), being higher in the footballer than in the control condition with a small to moderate to high effect size, Cohen’s d = 0.52 (r = 0.25) ( Table 5 ).

In general, higher SD SBP and ARV SBP were significantly associated with lower mean levels of serum AST and ALT, except a borderline significant association between ARV SBP and mean levels of serum ALT ( p = 0.06).

The increase in NE from pre to post ASD approached significance ( p = 0.06).

The individuals with the family history of chronic diseases had BP checked more frequently; however, the results were of borderline significance (OR = 1.3; p = 0.06).