Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

borderline significantp = 0.040.8× alphagold
Correlation of PCR HR-HPV and anal histology showed a borderline significant association with the presence of LSIL (AIN1; KI: 0.12; p = 0.04), and non-significant with HSIL (AIN2/3; KI: 0.05; p = 0.14) ( Table 4 ).
borderline significantp = 0.040.8× alphagold
Further none of the secondary variables did show any significant differences from placebo apart from MMTT AUC C-peptide 0-4h and GGI AUC Glucose0-1h which showed mechanistically contradictory borderline significant effects of p = 0.04 and 0.045 respectively (Fig F in S1 File and Table 2 ).
mildly significantp = 0.040.8× alphaqualifiedgold
How much does differential homophily account for the distribution of HSV-2 and is there an epidemiologically relevant relationship between sexual homophily and geographic remoteness? Is there a relationship between the proportion of an individual’s homophilous contacts and their likelihood of having been exposed to HSV-2? Using a univariate logistic regression model, we found a mildly significant relationship between individuals’ proportion of homophilous sexual partners and having HSV-2 (OR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.04–3.13; p = 0.04).
only marginally significantp = 0.040.8× alphagold
Sighted controls’ error when the sound ended 25 cm to the right was only marginally significant (one sample, 2-tailed t-tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparison, t (7) = 2.44, p = 0.04).
Intercepting a sound without vision.
PLoS One · 2017 · PMC5421809
Three-factor RM-ANOVA (target size x target location x luminance type) for BSRs showed a marginally statistically significant main effect of only target location [F(4,240) = 3.94, p = 0.04, η p 2 = 0.01)], while target size [F(1,240) = 2.13, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.03)] and stimulus luminance [F(1,240) = 20, p = 0.77, η p 2 ≤0.01)] were not statistically significant ( Fig 6 ).
marginally significantp = .040.8× alphagold
Interestingly, post-hoc simple comparisons of each phase of the menstrual cycle also revealed that emotional word advantage was significantly greater in LVF than RVF during the menstruation phase ( F (1, 9) = 7.8611, p = .02), marginally significant during the follicular phase (F(1, 9) = 5.8, p = .04) and not significant during the early, mid- and late luteal phases ( p >.05).
approached significancep = 0.040.8× alpha
However, FA was significantly higher in the older children at a specific location medial to the central sulcus (marked by an arrow in figure 3a ) in the left hemisphere (FA older children = 0.51, FA younger children = 0.46, t = 3.64, p<0.05 corrected) and approached significance at the same location in the right hemisphere (FA older children = 0.48, FA younger children = 0.44, t = 2.13, p = 0.04 uncorrected).
modestly significantp = 0.0400.8× alphaqualifiedgold
We found a highly significant strain effect ( F 1, 56 = 102.07, p = 3.2×10 −14 , η p 2 = 0.646), no significant effect of week studied ( F 3, 56 = 1.72, p = 0.17, η p 2 = 0.084), and a modestly significant interaction effect ( F 3, 56 = 2.96, p = 0.040, η p 2 = 0.137) using a two-way ANOVA on transformed in-cage activity data.