A significant trend was also observed between the tumor size and the risk of NTBL metastasis (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.02–2.14, P = 0.04).
Excerpts
Correlation of PCR HR-HPV and anal histology showed a borderline significant association with the presence of LSIL (AIN1; KI: 0.12; p = 0.04), and non-significant with HSIL (AIN2/3; KI: 0.05; p = 0.14) ( Table 4 ).
showed a trendp = 0.04
In a multivariate analysis, adjusted for occurrence of graft-versus-host-disease, Cytomegalovirus serostatus and duration of neutropenia, paired presence of the TLR4 1063A>G and IFNG 874T>A single nucleotide polymorphisms showed a trend towards increased susceptibility to invasive aspergillosis (p = 0.04).
Additionally, a significant trend was observed for the end of the nesting season, which has been delayed by an average of 1.0 days.yr -1 (p = 0.04, R2 = 0.19).
Further none of the secondary variables did show any significant differences from placebo apart from MMTT AUC C-peptide 0-4h and GGI AUC Glucose0-1h which showed mechanistically contradictory borderline significant effects of p = 0.04 and 0.045 respectively (Fig F in S1 File and Table 2 ).
In terms of performance, there was a marginally significant decrease in overall performance (from 63% to 51%; z = 2.01; p = .04).
How much does differential homophily account for the distribution of HSV-2 and is there an epidemiologically relevant relationship between sexual homophily and geographic remoteness? Is there a relationship between the proportion of an individual’s homophilous contacts and their likelihood of having been exposed to HSV-2? Using a univariate logistic regression model, we found a mildly significant relationship between individuals’ proportion of homophilous sexual partners and having HSV-2 (OR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.04–3.13; p = 0.04).
of borderline significanceP = 0.04
Tumors having both alterations, while present in a small subpopulation (n = 6), had worse prognosis of borderline significance ( P = 0.04, Fig. 7 ).
Sighted controls’ error when the sound ended 25 cm to the right was only marginally significant (one sample, 2-tailed t-tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparison, t (7) = 2.44, p = 0.04).
In addition, we observed a nominally significant association (p = 0.04) with rs11209026, which is in agreement with the previously described effect on AS of the IL23R locus (Supporting Table S1 ) [4] .
Differences did not reach statistical significance compared to spontaneous preterm cases except for sICAM-1 and sE-selectin in the 3 rd trimester (p<0.04 for each, table 2 ).
Only in the group of AIPC with intrapancreatic involvement there was a slightly significant increase in the IgG4-CD138 ratio in comparison with non-autoimmune CP (p = 0.04).
Three-factor RM-ANOVA (target size x target location x luminance type) for BSRs showed a marginally statistically significant main effect of only target location [F(4,240) = 3.94, p = 0.04, η p 2 = 0.01)], while target size [F(1,240) = 2.13, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.03)] and stimulus luminance [F(1,240) = 20, p = 0.77, η p 2 ≤0.01)] were not statistically significant ( Fig 6 ).
After pooling all three sets of data, only the allele frequency showed a marginal significance, OR = 1.18 (95% CI = 1.01, 1.37, P = 0.04), and CT + TT genotypes did not reach a level of significant difference, OR = 1.15 (95% CI = 0.9–1.36, P = 0.09) ( Table 1 ).
Interestingly, post-hoc simple comparisons of each phase of the menstrual cycle also revealed that emotional word advantage was significantly greater in LVF than RVF during the menstruation phase ( F (1, 9) = 7.8611, p = .02), marginally significant during the follicular phase (F(1, 9) = 5.8, p = .04) and not significant during the early, mid- and late luteal phases ( p >.05).
borderline significanceP = 0.04
With a borderline significance (P = 0.04), possibly because of our relatively small sample size, it remains to be concluded whether early natural exposure could also negatively influence vaccine seroconversion as previously observed in South Africa and Nicaragua [ 22 , 27 , 43 ].
In a univariate analysis there was a significant negative correlation between PTH and 25(OH) D (p<0.0001, see Table 4 ) and a significant trend for PTH to be higher in Indian subjects (p = 0.04) and females (p = 0.0002).
There was a marginally significant trend towards fright response (boldness) being consistent over time (P = 0.04; q = 0.07).
Shapiro-Wilk’s test for the total sample returned significant results only for fluency and elaboration, with marginal significance for flexibility ( p = .04).
We found a significant association between the genetic variation at DHX32 (rs12356233, corrected P =0.019) and a nominally significant association between RGS12 and the response to adalimumab (rs4690093, uncorrected P =0.040).
In addition, we detected a marginally significant sex-by-diet interaction at hatching ( F 2,480 = 3.27, P = 0.04) but the effect was not present in the next few developmental stages ( F ≤2.11, P ≥0.11 for the next three stages).
approached significancep = .04
No main effect for Retrieval-Status was found ( F (1,81) = 1.25, MSE = .03 η 2 p = .02, p = .268) but the Retrieval-Status x WMC interaction approached significance ( F (1,81) = 3.78, MSE = .08 η 2 p = .04, p = .055), indicating a trend toward the result observed in the full, more powerful analysis.
approached significancep = 0.04
However, FA was significantly higher in the older children at a specific location medial to the central sulcus (marked by an arrow in figure 3a ) in the left hemisphere (FA older children = 0.51, FA younger children = 0.46, t = 3.64, p<0.05 corrected) and approached significance at the same location in the right hemisphere (FA older children = 0.48, FA younger children = 0.44, t = 2.13, p = 0.04 uncorrected).
We found a highly significant strain effect ( F 1, 56 = 102.07, p = 3.2×10 −14 , η p 2 = 0.646), no significant effect of week studied ( F 3, 56 = 1.72, p = 0.17, η p 2 = 0.084), and a modestly significant interaction effect ( F 3, 56 = 2.96, p = 0.040, η p 2 = 0.137) using a two-way ANOVA on transformed in-cage activity data.
While HbA1C did not show any significant associations in any of the areas, FBS showed significant association with increased thickness in the superior parafoveal sector, but did not reach statistical significance when Bonferroni correction was applied, p = 0.04.