Excerpts

Whilst the semantic class of the image was related to classification accuracy, the raw meaning (as measured by the average semantic differential scores) was only marginally significant (all p >0.05).

Steers infected with IBR (n = 4) using the same isolate and infection schedule as in the pilot study, showed a highly significant difference from mock infected controls (n = 4) beginning on day 2 after infection (post-hoc Bonferroni test p < 0.05).

When KH 2 PO 4 in the medium is replaced either by Ca 3 (PO 4 ) 2 or L - α -phosphatidylcholine, the increase in cyanobacterial cell density is quite significant ( P < 0.05, P < 0.01), and become more prominent with increase in inoculum density of strain JXJ CY 19 T (Tables 2 and 3 ).

When we conditioned on rs2178403, three of the nine variants in the best model for PSMD2 remained nominally significant (p <0.05).

However, patients with PD showed increased RD values compared to HC subjects with a trend level of significance ( p = 0.05 TFCE-corrected), located in clusters including the anterior corona radiata (frontal lobe WM), genu of the corpus callosum, and body of the corpus callosum in the left hemisphere, and the frontal WM in the right hemisphere.

The association of AIx, cSBP and pSBP with MAU and mildly decreased GFR was highly significant in the first model, and held even after adjustment in the second and third models (P<0.05 for all); meanwhile, the association strength of MAU and mildly decreased GFR with cBP was similar to those with pBP in the first, second and third models.

There was also an increasing trend in the TERT transcript level: REL = 1.311 (p = 0.05).

All relevant variables retrieved from univariate analysis together with duration of infertility -that showed borderline significance (p = 0.05) on univariate analysis -were subsequently included in the multivariate analysis of factors related to the top quality blastocyst formation rate.

We observed an overall trend of increasing nictation, with significant differences in NR between day 2 (the earliest timepoint assayed) and days 6 and 21 (Dunn’s test p < 0.05 after Bonferroni correction for 36 comparisons) ( Fig 5B ) .

When discussing the results of the correlations performed in our study, one must bear in mind that even though the single correlations may be significant with a p <0.05, the overall risk of a type I error (false positive result) increases with the number of correlations.

In accordance with the findings in mice, a nominally significant ( P <0.05) association between CDKAL1 rs4712523 and BMI was replicated in 2 Japanese general populations comprising 5,695 and 12,569 samples; the risk allele for type 2 diabetes was also associated with decreased BMI.

The results were presented as the means ± SD, and the significant and extremely significant levels were set at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively.

A P value< 0.05 was considered statistically indicated significant, and a P value < 0.01 considered highly significant (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001).

Differences in protein composition between fractions were considered highly significant if the G-test significance was p<0.05.

The difference in early-life fecundity was marginally significant ( F 1,37 = 3.98; p = 0.05).

Statistically significant difference was assumed at P < 0.05 and a tendency toward significance was assumed at P ≥ 0.05 but P < 0.10.

Treatments with 10 nM and 100 nM inhibitor did not reach statistical significance (i.e., P <0.05).

While each group also shows significant dishabituation (p<0.0001, Tukey's test for both genotypes), manifested as increased sniffing to a novel olfactory probe (vanilla extract) as compared to the last habituation trial, the main effect of genotype was not significantly significant (F 1,5 = 0.39, p>0.05).

There was a borderline significant 1.7-fold increase in mean Errα mRNA levels (95% CI 0.99 to 2.49; p = 0.05).

A difference was considered to be statistically significant and highly significant when p<0.05 and p<0.01 respectively.

Total body fat, android fat and gynoid fat were significantly decreased post-training in responders, although the decrease in android fat in non-responders was of borderline significance (P = 0.05).

REM min showed a trend for shorter REM duration for stroke than controls (d = -1.2; SE = 0.7; Z-value = -1.2; p = 0.050), while REM % was insignificant (d = -1.6; SE = 1.3; Z-value = -1.2; p = 0.241).

In the same time interval, an increase in BLI signal from the rest of the mouse as measure for development of metastasis ( Fig 2E ) was observed for LM2-4 (day 7.5: 3.8x10 6 ± 6.8x10 6 p/s, n = 12; day 21: 1.2x10 8 ± 1.4x10 8 p/s, n = 10; P = 0.03, t -test), but did not reach statistical significance for LM2-4H2N (day 7.5: 3.1 x10 6 ± 4.3 x10 6 p/s, n = 11; day 21: 8.0x10 7 ± 1.1x10 8 p/s, n = 10; P = 0.05, t -test).

While we did not observe significant interactions with genotype group within the latter latency window (Congruency×Genotype: p>.05, Congruency×Genotype×Site: p>.05), we did observe a (marginally significant) Congruency×Genotype interaction in the earlier (600 and 800 ms) time window (F(1,47) = 4.03, MSe = 46.38, p = .05; Congruency×Genotype×Site: p>.05).

This difference was marginally significant (χ 2 = 3.77, df = 1, P = 0.05).