Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

approached significanceP = 0.061.2× alpha
No significant differences in circulating INSL3 concentration were observed for any day between gravid and non-gravid sheep ( Fig.1A ), although in the pregnant ewes the increase in INSL3 concentrations on day 12 compared to day 5 approached significance (P = 0.06), and values were close to being significantly different between gravid and non-gravid animals (P = 0.07) on day 17.
not quite significantP = 0.061.2× alphagold
Mean K v current densities at +60 mV, measured approximately 3 minutes following the establishment of whole-cell configurations, were 30.9 ± 3.8 (n = 13) and 21.8 ± 2.2 (n = 10) pA pF -1 in control and in PKAi-RR containing pipette solutions respectively (this difference was not quite significant (P = 0.06), though as stated above current densities were variable in these cells).
only marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
The presence of the round goby had a significant positive effect on the abundance of perch, cyprinids, piscivores, CPP, large perch (p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, Table 1 , Fig 2 ), and ruff (p < 0.01, Table 1 , Fig 3 ), and a significant negative effect on the abundance of flounder ( Fig 2 ) and whitefish (p < 0.05, Table 1 , Fig 3 ), although the effect on the flounder populations was only marginally significant (p = 0.06, Table 1 ).
borderline significantP = 0·061.2× alphagold
There were significant associations with gender (males have a higher risk than females: RR = 6.8, P = 0.002) and age (for each decade older, the risk increases by a factor of 1.9, P <0·001), and there was a borderline significant association with tuberculin skin test positivity (RR = 6.84, P = 0·06).
borderline significantP = 0.061.2× alphagold
The average PPARGC1A methylation at four CpG sites situated 867-624 bp from the transcription start was associated with whole-body insulin sensitivity in a paradoxical positive manner (β = 0.12, P = 0.03), supported by a borderline significant inverse correlation with fasting insulin levels (β = −0.88, P = 0.06).
marginally non-significantP = 0.061.2× alpha
Mean torpor frequency (i.e., percentage of days on which torpor was used) was 58.3 ± 18.1% (N = 122 bouts) in the deep shade treatment, 54.8 ± 20.3% (N = 124 bouts) in the partial shade treatment, and 27.8 ± 28.1% (N = 51 bouts) in the full sun treatment, with variation among the three treatments being marginally non-significant (LMM, F 1, 16 = 3.98, P = 0.06).