Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp<.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A contrast of the difference between Exceptions and Regulars in the first quarter and the average difference in the last two quarters is highly significant (accuracy: F(1,105) = 32.74, p<.0001; latency: F(1,105) = 48.40, p<.0001) and the remaining variance in the interaction is not significant (accuracy: F(2,105) = 1.00, p>.25; latency: F(2,105) = 1.29, p>.25) We also did separate analysis of the Exception Problems, classifying them by type and difficulty.
a significant trendP <0.00010.0× alphagold
The mean (standard deviation) number of days from vaccination to onset of symptoms for influenza-positive subjects was 119 (21) compared with 109 (32) for influenza-negative subjects, with a significant trend for increasing risk ( P <0.0001) of a positive influenza result in the unadjusted analysis considering days elapsed since vaccination to onset of symptoms ( Table 4 ).
nearing significanceP <0.00010.0× alphagold
The model snakes mimicking the snakes found on limestone had significantly greater achromatic and chromatic contrasts on volcanic rocks (achromatic: F 1,15 = 80.13, P <0.0001; chromatic: F 1,15 = 6.930, P = 0.019), while model snakes representing the snakes found on volcanic rock only had significantly greater achromatic contrasts on limestone, however chromatic contrasts was nearing significance (achromatic: F 1,15 = 38.33, P <0.0001; chromatic: F 1,15 = 5.669, P = 0.031).
highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The multiple regression model for color was highly significant (R 2 = 0.84, F 3,110 = 188, P <0.0001), but the slope and intercepts were affected by ecosystem type, which resulted in the following equations: (2) and (3) Despite the differences in the regression parameters, most of the color observations from the experimental ponds fell within the 95% prediction intervals associated with the regression model for natural lakes in equation 3 ( Fig. 2a ).
extremely significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualified
P-value (P) >0.05 was considered as not significant (ns), 0.01< P <0.05 as significant and indicated with one asterisks *, 0.001< P <0.01 very significant and indicated with two asterisks **, 0.0001< P <0.001 extremely significant and indicated with three asterisks *** and P <0.0001 extremely significant and indicated with four asterisks ****.
highly significantP< 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The FT-B1 alleles showed highly significant differences in heading time ( P< 0.0001) within both alleles of FT-A1 , but the differences between the adjusted means of the FT-B1 alleles were 34% larger in the lines homozygous for the mutant ft-A1 allele (25.0 day delay in flowering) than in the lines homozygous or heterozygous for the wild type FT-A1 allele (18.6 day delay).
highly significantP<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Estradiol concentrations showed no significant differences (P>0.05) between the two experimental groups treated with T, but the 17β-nortestosterone concentration in serum samples collected from the ND2 experimental group were highly significant (P<0.0001), higher than the concentration of 17β-nortestosterone from the ND1 group samples.