Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Although the main effect of participant group was marginally significant ( F (1,12) = 4.05, p = 0.07), Newman-Keuls tests did not reveal significant differences between the control gains of the two participant groups for either the vertical ( p = 0.14) or the horizontal ( p = 0.13) target motion conditions.
borderline significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Associations between EDS, future CHD or stroke evaluated separately were significant after adjustment in model 2 (HR = 1.36 95%CI = [1.02–1.80], HR = 1.52 95%CI = [1.00–2.34], respectively) and borderline significant after adjustment in model 3 (HR = 1.30 95%CI = [0.98–1.73] p = 0.07, HR = 1.48 95%CI = [0.96–2.28] p = 0.08, respectively).
only marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
It is worth noting, however, that using a slightly altered model–which treats APOE as a nominal or categorical ( carrier / non - carrier ) variable–in order to re-analyze a sub-set of this data which excludes these two ε2 subjects: 1) does not significantly alter the ε4 effects seen, and 2) still generates results suggestive of a protective morphometric main effect of a single ε2 allele (an effect size of +505.84 mm 3 , equivalent to a nearly 13% increase in hippocampal volume; Cohen’s d = 0.14, effect size r = 0.68)–though, this result is only marginally significant ( p = 0.07) (see Table 8 for a full summary of the results for this modified model).
approached significancep = 0.071.4× alpha
Proportional prey selection did not differ significantly between seasons neither for males (Friedman χ 2 early dry-late dry = 10.17, df = 7, p = 0.18; Friedman χ 2 early dry-wet = 9.57, df = 7, p = 0.21; Friedman χ 2 late dry-wet = 11.70, df = 7, p = 0.11), nor for females even though results approached significance level (Friedman χ 2 early dry-late dry = 12.95, df = 7, p = 0.07; Friedman χ 2 early dry-wet = 11.67, df = 7, p = 0.11; Friedman χ 2 late dry-wet = 12.45, df = 7, p = 0.08).
marginally significantp = .071.4× alphagold
Importantly, however, dyscalculics were more impaired at comparing pairs of numbers characterized by a small numerical distance, indicated by a significant group by distance interaction for RTs and by a marginally significant interaction for accuracy (accuracy: F (7,434) = 1.87, p = .07, η 2 G = .02; for RTs: F (7,434) = 2.48, p = .02, η 2 G = .005).
showed a trendp = 0.071.4× alpha
As it is shown in Figure 1 , apoptosis markers were significantly increased in serum samples from both pediatric and adult patients with CHC compared to healthy subjects, except for sFas levels in CHC pediatric patient samples which only showed a trend of association (p = 0.07).