However, the original study that analyzed GSE17308 showed that the difference did not quite reach significance ( P = 0.08, Kruskal-Wallist test) and had no observable effect on gene expression profiles in unsupervised clustering analysis or in supervised ANOVA analyses [ 9 ].
Similar to the habituation phase, in the reunion phase, IN OXT mothers showed a nonsignificant trend for producing more simple sweeps than control mothers (F 2,20 = 3.13, p = 0.08, ΔR 2 = 0.15) ( Fig 2A ).
ALC-treated nulls showed a trend toward a preference for the novel object [ p = 0.08].
Migraineurs had a significant difference between 1s and 8s trials (student t-test, p = 0.03 in CW, p = 0.02 CCW), but controls did not quite reach significance (p = 0.08 in CW, p = 0.06 CCW).
The three-way interaction involving intention, action type, and plane compatibility was only marginally significant, F (1, 18) = 3.44, p = 0.08, η p 2 = 0.16.
The effect was only marginally significant (p = 0.08) but the power was low (P = 50%).
Combining EZH2 and SUZ12 showed a trend for DFS in multivariate analyses, with p = 0.08 (HR = 0.77; 95% CI 0.57–1.04).
There was a marginal trend for gender differences in depression level (p = 0.08) but not a significant difference in the unadjusted bivariate comparison.
Model 1 showed a trend towards an increase in DST% of 0.6% per day during the workweek (p = 0.08).
pseudowords) by group interaction was of borderline significance, F (1, 31) = 3.25, p = .08.
IFN-γ-concentrations showed a trend (combination vs. mNOX-E36, p = 0.08; combination vs.
We identified a marginally significant association between lesions located at brain level A and ruffling observed over 90dpi (ANOVA; p = 0.08 overall; CC027, p = 0.06).
In paired comparisons of Recurring and New stimuli, the effect approached significance only for the Foreign language [900–1200 ms: Foreign: t(8) = 2.0, p = 0.08; Native: t(8) = 0.95, p = 0.37].
The correlation between the traders' 2D∶4D and their Sharpe Ratios, however, while displaying the expected sign, only approached significance at the 5% level (n = 47, r = −0.26, p = 0.08).
Results In Experiment 1, for pleasantness ratings, an effect of “Age” (F[1.36] = 6.693, p = 0.01) associated to an effect of “Hedonic valence” (F[1,36] = 370.990, p<0.0001), and a nearly significant “Age-by-Hedonic valence” interaction (F[1,36] = 3.039, p = 0.08) were observed, suggesting that whereas no significant effect of “Age” occurred for unpleasant odors (p>0.05), older adults rated pleasant odors as less pleasant than did young adults (p = 0.004) ( Fig. 1a.i ).
A 3×2 (Age [9 months, 12 months, adults]) × Condition [individual, joint]) ANOVA with gaze latency yielded significant main effects of age, F (2,57) = 167.89, p <.001, η 2 G = .80, and condition, F (1,57) = 4.50, p = .04, η 2 G = .004, as well as a marginally significant interaction between both, F (2,57) = 2.59, p = .08, η 2 G = .005 [generalised eta squared values are presented to ensure comparability with other studies, see 41, 42].
2D ), reduced mRNA levels of the cystathionine β-synthase (Cbs) gene were detected with 66.3±2.7% of controls and marginal significance (p = 0.08), but no significant differences for cystathionase (Cth) were measured (p = 0.29).
Insulin release assessed through the novel BIGTT-AIR test was increased for individuals with the AA genotype, but only borderline significant (OR = 1.36, p = 0.08).
SYBR-green quantitative PCR revealed that over-expression of Pgc-1α resulted in a significant down-regulation of Pitx3 to 0.25±0.11 from a 0.79±0.08 level of expression after mCherry ( Figure 5C , 95% CI 0.23 to 0.85; p = 0.003), a nonsignificant trend toward lower Nurr1 expression (0.47±0.14 from 0.93±0.18, a difference of 0.46±0.24; 95% CI −0.08 to 1.0; p = 0.08), and no loss of Lmx1b expression relative to mCherry microinjected SN (1.26±0.33 from 1.1±0.23, a difference of −0.17±0.39; 95% CI −1.07 to 0.73; p = 0.677).
A one-way ANOVA for treatment group on the density of Arc mRNA expression in PRL ( Figure 7B ) showed a strong trend (F 4,23 = 2.4, p = 0.08) towards significance.
For the DLPFC, there was a marginally significant scan × perceived criticism × valence effect, F (19,679.0) = 1.49, p = . 08 and significant perceived criticism × valence effect, F (1, 429.4) = 19.9, p <.0005 with a larger PC differential response in the criticism condition than in the praise condition.
55 years, p = 0.02), and a marginally significant higher percentage were undergoing dialysis before their most current admission that led to VAP (22% vs. 10%, p = 0.08).
A marginally significant effect for risk × group (F (1, 214) = 3.09, p = 0.08) was observed with the HIV- group selecting risky choices marginally more than the HIV+ group (HIV-: risky M = 0.19, safe M = 0.62; HIV+: risky M = 0.14, safe = 0.68).
Similar results were observed for replacing long sedentary bouts with standing, walking, MVPA or brief sedentary bouts, except that the results of replacing 30 minutes of long sedentary bouts during work with MVPA became marginally non-significant for %BF [B(95%CI); -1.42 (-3.02 to 0.19)%, P = 0.08) and BMI (-1.03(-2.15 to 0.09) kg/m 2 , P = 0.07) (results not shown).
The next two most significant associations observed were for raised lesions in the abdominal and the thoracic aorta with p values that showed a trend towards significance (p = 0.08 and 0.11, respectively).