Excerpts

Effects were considered significant when P ≤ 0.050 and a statistical trend when P ≤ 0.100.

The difference between group B and group D is significant on day 1 (p <0.05) and nearly significant on day 7 and day 14 (p < 0.1).

For genetic markers with a marginally significant (p <0.1) genotype by age (age ≤2 years and >2 years) interaction, regression models were fit to each age group separately.

Having been apprehended as a child was also marginally significant (at a level of p<0.10) in our final multivariable model (AOR = 1.48; 95%CI 0.90–2.43), and age was not statistically significant (AOR = 1.00 (95% 0.97–1.03)).

In general areas, having a small seedbank due to weed control every year, differences of marginal significance (P < 0.1) were only found in 2016 ( Table 4 ).

In the neostriatum, CrT −/y mice showed a trend towards increased DA (F(1,16) = 3.64, P<0.10); they had increased levels of 5-HIAA (F(1,16) = 12.41, P<0.01) and 5-HIAA/5-HT (F(1,16) = 11.63, P<0.01) compared with CrT +/y mice.

By contrast, marigold treated tomatoes experienced a near-significant reduction in fruit weight per plant compared to the control ( p = 0.100) and a significantly lighter fruit weight than the limonene treatment ( p = 0.014).

This improvement was almost significant for the trained condition (Interaction F (1,42) = 2.8, p = 0.1, partial η 2 = 0.06).

The covariates, which were found to be significant or nearly significant (p≤0.10) in univariate analysis, were included to construct a multivariate model for assessing determinants of treatment failure by forward stepwise logistic regression.

After incorporating interactions between bone lead and genotypes into the models, we found that 5 and 4 polymorphisms reached statistical significance (p<0.05) and borderline significance (p<0.1), respectively, when genotypes were modeled as additive ( Table 3 ).

Although factors such as BMI and hypertension approached significance in the interaction ( p < 0.1), these differences did not reach statistical significance ( p > 0.05), further supporting the generalized role of PA across individuals.

No other combination of [facial expression and V-A-D] showed a significant main effect between the two genotypes, although we observed a marginally significant ( p <0.1) difference in angry expression with valence rating ( F 1,120 = 3.45, p = 0.07) and in neutral expression with valence rating ( F 1,120 = 3.44, p = 0.07), which were consistent with the analysis with representative values.

A backwards-stepwise model building procedure was used: those variables that were statistically significant or approaching significance (P<0.1) in the univariable analysis were included in the multivariable analysis.

There was also a slight trend towards a decrease in the length of the ulnas at 9 weeks of age (p<0.1 and p<0.09 respectively).

A marginally significant association ( P <0.10) was found for three additional SNPs: rs1045485 (2q33/ CASP8 ), rs4849887 (2q14/ INHBB ), and rs4808801 (19p13/ ELL ).

Factors that demonstrated a moderately significant statistical relationship in the univariate analysis ( P <.1) were entered by forward selection in a multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression model [22] .

In addition, in Model 3 the influence of an “integration” ethnic orientation went from non-significant to marginally significant (p < .10) and the influence of an “attenuation” ethnic orientation went from significant at p < .05 to non-significant.

Moreover, a marginally significant correlation (r = −0.425, p<0.10) between planktivory of yellow catfish and zooplankton biomass was also found in this study.

Statistical significance levels were set at p < 0.05, and marginal significance p < 0.1 [ 40 ].

However, these intra-annual differences were only marginally significant (P<0.1).

The interaction between SLM training and gender is also positive and marginally significant (β = 0.0.315, p < 0.1 ).

Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analysis of cancer-specific survival showed a trend towards significance in ER-negative patients (P<0.1) and was significant in triple negative patients (P<0.05).

NAc FC values between the mPFC and the right NAc showed a trend towards a positive correlation with mPFC Glx/NAA (r = 0.47, p = 0.10) during the EO condition that became significant with Glu/NAA (r = 0.67, p = 0.012).

Indoor air bacterial communities reveal almost significant differences compared to those of floor dust (0.05< p <0.1).

Our borderline significant results (0.05<p-value<0.10) in all likelihood are due to low statistical power.