Statistical analysis of the data confirmed a highly significant reduction in the spindle size (degrees of freedom [DF] = 63; P = 5×10−4) and a significant increase in the lengths of cilia (DF = 147; P = 3×10−3; Figure 4E ).
Excerpts
For hsa-mir-21, the DKD group showed a fold change of 0.668 ± 0.25 (SE) with a highly significant p-value (p < 0.0005), and the FSGS group showed a fold change of 2.267 ± 1.138 (SE) with statistical significance (p < 0.0077). hsa-mir-30a was downregulated in the DKD group with a fold change of 0.874 ± 0.254 (SE), not reaching statistical significance (p = 0.079), while the FSGS group showed a significant upregulation with a fold change of 1.378 ± 0.312 (SE) (p < 0.0006).
The minor allele frequency for the linked intron3 SNPs was 0.74 for affected and 0.32 for unaffected family members ( Table 2 ), a highly significant difference (p = 0.0005).
Additionally markers on chromosomes 5, 10, 14, 15, 17, 21 and 24 had P values approaching significance (p≤5E-4).
However, there was a highly significant Ear of Delivery×Hemisphere interaction (F (2,16) = 13.03, p<0.0005).
The Welch’s ANOVA assessment found that the difference in mean FBS between the groups was highly significant ( P = 0.0005 ) ( Table 1 ).
The dermatitis in the skin of all mutant mice was associated with a highly significant (p < 0.0005) increased expression of Chil3 consistent with type 2 inflammation ( S14 Fig ).
The ratio N tokens / N full population ( Table 3 ) shows a highly significant linear inverse correlation with the number of municipalities (R 2 = 0.23; p = 0.000544; see Fig 5 ).
Decreases in high-dose treated verses mock-treated mice were most pronounced and highly significant in the thalamus ( p = 0.000557 by a 2 sample t -test); no significant differences in staining were seen amongst groups in the hippocampus ( p = 0.825 for the high-dose group compared to the mock treated group and p = 0.839 for the low-dose group compared to the mock treated group, again with a 2 sample t -test).
There were some other nominally significant associations in the intergenic region telomeric to the ACRV1 gene (all p ≥5.6x10 -4 ).
Co-expression with the β1 subunit consistently increased the mean peak currents, and this was highly significant overall (P = 0.00057, 2-Way ANOVA), with no significant differences between the current densities driven by splicing (P = 0.20 all 4 variants, 2-Way ANOVA).
Our study was not designed to detect the correlation between HPDT and areas of secondary hyperalgesia; however, we find a highly significant result (P = 0.0006).
A highly significant difference (p < 0.0006) was observed when we plotted and compared the fold regulation of STAT1-dependent genes vs .
Our analysis of 438 Malian children with UM shows a moderate, but highly significant, correlation (r = 0.1641, p = 0.0006) between UA levels and parasite densities.
Effect of treatment, landscape diversity, and prairie vegetation on the bee community Regression analyses with the presence or absence of prairie strips and Shannon landscape diversity as independent variables indicated that strip treatment had a highly significant effect on the abundance of all bees ( Fig 3a and S6 Table ; p = 0.0006), 8 common bees ( Fig 3b ; p = 0.0014), 9 common bees ( Fig 3c ; p = 0.0022), and uncommon bees ( Fig 3d ; p = 0.0002).
The analysis of the trend performed using the Jonckheere-Terpstra test showed a significant trend between the value of pelvic tilt and the values of radial displacement of the belly of muscle for ES (p = 0.00060*), GM (p = 0.00493*), RA (p = 0.00009*) and OAE muscles (0.00015*).
For the plant ID beginner group we found those who received video training (cohort 2) did better than those who received text/image training and the difference was highly significant (B = 2.72; SE = 0.79; p = 0.0006).
A t-test comparing RISKDIFF high revealed a highly significant difference between the two genotypes (5.0±1.3% for L/L versus −5.0±2.2% for S/L; t = 7.69, df = 5, p = 0.0006; Figure 3B ).
FHO/RP ratio did not present significant differences in yellow-green light conditions in between groups comparison, whereas in infrared light condition the comparison between groups showed a highly significant difference (p = 0.0006) with a larger ratio in Control Group (1.055) compared to TMD Group (0.967) ( Table 2 ).
The difference between experimental conditions was highly significant (W = 88, p = 0.00061).
In fact, permutation test analyses (100,000 iterations) detected highly significant values for П (P = 0.00066) and π (P = 0.00063) in Intermediate Area populations compared to those from the Magellanic Province.
However, a nominally significant association was revealed at rs16952725 of FTO in males ( P -value = 6.87×10 −4 for BMI and P -value = 8.55×10 −3 for FM), but not in the female specific sample ( P -value = 0.55 for BMI and P -value = 0.43 for FM) ( Table 3 ).
After accounting for the effect of network size on N (type-2 regression: N = 0.59+0.077*logSize, F 1,57 = 9.98, P<0.0025), differences between network types were highly significant (F 2,56 = 8.21, P<0.0007) and pair-wise comparisons discriminated comensalistic networks from antagonistic and mutualistic ones (Scheffé-test: P<0.0009 and P<0.029, respectively), which differed marginally between themselves (P>0.052).
When patients were dichotomized by averaged expression values of SPARC and SPP1 , the association between the two genes and OS was highly significant (P = 0.0007, by log-rank test), strongly suggesting that the prognostic association of the two genes in EAC is synergistic ( Figure 4C ).
Functional group richness had a highly significant negative relationships with latitude (P = 0.0007, R 2 = 0.7101, F = 25.49, df = 9).