Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

nearly significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
Analysis of Lot-R (assessing optimism and pessimism) revealed a nearly significant difference between the two sub-groups (t (39) = −2.012, p = 0.051) with lower scores in participants with positive Δ TENS effectiveness (12.61 ± 0.83) compared to those with negative Δ TENS effectiveness (15.22 ± 1.02), suggesting that the former were more pessimist than the latter ( Fig. 4f ).
a strong trendp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
In the second model of multivariable analysis, taking into account the use vs not-use of medical devices, a strong trend supporting a protective role for diabetes nearly reaching statistical significance was observed (OR 0.64, 95% C.I. 0.41–1.00, p = 0.051).
marginally significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
As displayed in the Supplementary Materials (Table S4 ), all findings remained significant ( p < 0.01), except for the direct daily association between NO 2 and fatigue which became marginally significant ( p = 0.051) but continued to be qualified by the significant interaction.
showed a trendp = 0.0511.0× alpha
A post hoc statistical test identified a significant increase in the rate of missteps in the stroke group (pre-test, 11.0 ± 2.1%; post-test, 13.5 ± 1.3%, p = 0.040; mean ± SD); the sham treatment group showed a trend of decreasing missteps (pre-test, 10.4 ± 2.0%; post-test, 8.1 ± 1.7%, p = 0.051; mean ± SD), whereas the stroke group had a higher rate of missteps compared to the sham treatment group at the post-test (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2 B, Supplementary Table S1 online).
a strong trendp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
Sub-group analysis comparing the VP group only with the TB group revealed significant differences for the YASR DSM-oriented scale for avoidant personality (Z=−2.41, p = 0.016, r rb =−0.17), while the YASR DSM-oriented scale for anxiety revealed a strong trend (Z=−1.95, p = 0.051, r rb =−0.14).
marginally significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
Impulsivity as a moderator of the relationship between body fat and brain volumes The interaction term between % body fat and impulsivity (UPPS-P total score) accounted for a marginally significant proportion of the variance in left mOFC volume (adjusted for ICV), b = −0.95, t (110) = −1.97, p = 0.051.
near-significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
Whether offspring were returned to genetic or foster parents did not significantly predict any measure of father-son song similarity, with one near-significant exception: Males returned to their biological parents tended to have higher sequential song similarity than those returned to foster parents (LMM: t = −2.05, p = 0.051).
marginally significantp = .0511.0× alphagold
When we did that, for SVO the pooled analysis showed an overall effect (β = 0.069, t = 1.53, p = .013), which means the effect of the target (compared to baseline) is consistent in this condition; for S ba OV the difference between the target condition and the baseline was not statistically significant (β = 0.011, t = 0.27, p = .079); the pooled results showed a marginally significant difference between the target condition and the baseline in O, S ba OV condition (β = 0.021, t = 0.67, p = .051).).