Excerpts

The water score was only marginally significant (p = 0.052).

At the same time there was no significant relationship between parental feeding rate and nest survival time during the poikilothermic nestling stage (r S = −0.34, p = 0.12, n = 14) and a near-significant relationship during the endothermic nestling stage (r S = −0.42, p = 0.052, n = 16).

In this model, group ( p < 0.001) and baseline diameter ( p = 0.027) remained independently associated with FMD%, while age showed a trend toward significance ( p = 0.052).

Adding the five serum components in Model 2 increased total explained variance to 46.5% (R2=0.465, adjusted R2=0.278) and the overall model approached significance (F (7,20) = 2.49, p = 0.052), but the change in R2 was not significant (ΔR2=0.150, F‐change (5,20) = 1.13, p = 0.379).

Both of the subgroups with 3 ~ 4 risk alleles and 5 ~ 6 risk alleles showed marginally significant or significant associations with increased KD risk (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.00–1.74, P = 0.052; OR = 2.93, 95% CI = 1.66–5.17, P < 0.001), and the Cochran-Armitage trend test indicated a significant dose effect with the ORs being increased with increasing numbers of risk alleles ( P trend < 0.001, Table 3 ).

For IL-1β, the overall difference between groups was borderline significant (global unadjusted p = 0.052; age-adjusted p = 0.051), with a trend toward higher medians in periodontitis (5.1-fold vs. healthy, p = 0.067; 3.7-fold vs. gingivitis, p = 0.195; Fig. 2 b).

Participants were more likely to provide accept evidence explanations for agents than explain away explanations ( β = 1.48, p < .001) and pattern explanations (marginally significant: β = 0.79, p = .052), compared to objects, and they were less likely to provide explain away explanations for agents than other explanations, compared to objects ( β = -0.95, p = .005).

However, the differences we found after the onset of the motor activities (0 − 1000 ms) were significant in C3 ( Z = 2.245, p = 0.025, Wilcoxon signed-rank test), and almost significant in C4 ( Z = 1.949, p = 0.052, Wilcoxon signed-rank test), with lower power activity in reality in both hemispheres.

Even more importantly, a marginally significant interaction between type of IMS stroking and percentage of self-other morphing (Identity) was observed (F 4,72 = 2.475, η 2 = 0.121, p = 0.052) (Fig. 2A ).

It has borderline significant association with all cause death (p = 0.052) and was not independently associated with HF hospitalisation or stroke or TIA.

Those with tertiary education also showed a decreased likelihood of self-medicating, although this was only marginally significant (AOR = 0.688, p = 0.052).

6 ; χ 2 (1) = 5.55, P = 0.0184), while the interaction between music playing condition and accompaniment condition approached significance (χ 2 (1) = 3.78, P = 0.052).

The rmANOVA with a Greenhouse–Geisser correction showed that the main effect of resource amount on the acceptance rate was only marginally significant, F (1.277, 72.791) = 3.601, p = 0.052, η p 2 = 0.059 (Fig. 3 A; Supplementary Table S2 and S3 for further detail).

The variation observed in the percentage of bees responding to sucrose solutions was marginally non-significant (GLMM, treatment: χ 2 = 9.41, df: 4, P = 0.052; sucrose concentration: χ 2 = 9.38, df: 4, P = 0.052).

Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA) confirmed that tree genotype significantly affected overall soil enzyme activities in Alniphyllum, while genotypic diversity level played a significant role in Alniphyllum , Cinnamomum and Daphniphyllum but its effect was only marginally significant in Idesia (P = 0.052; Fig. 3 ).

There was a borderline significant positive correlation (r = 0.242, P = 0.052, post-hoc power = 0.499) between the average RNFL thickness and the smaller/larger HF N95 amplitude ratio.

Thus, the changes in weight were shown to exhibit a decreasing trend at 24 weeks in the CETP T allele group ( p = 0.052; GG group weight change − 2.56%, GT group weight change − 8.24%; Fig. 2 B).

3 ), but only showed a marginally significant difference between the apple and banana substrates (GLM: χ 2 1,495 = 3.78, P = 0.052), and no effect of the interaction between resource type and frequency (GLM: χ 2 1,495 = 3.65, P = 0.06; Fig. 3 ).

Multivariate analysis showed a trend for high TILs to be an independent factor of low NR rate in all 94 cases {OR (95% CI): 0.126 (0.015–1.020); P = 0.052, Fig. 4 d}.

The second model showed a trend level improvement from the first model (Adjusted R 2 = 0.471, F (9, 73) = 9.103, p = 0.052).

Total energy intake decreased significantly in the intervention group by 32.4% (-757.23 ± 663.27 kcal, P < 0.001), while the control group had a less pronounced reduction of 16.7% (-380.88 ± 573.68 kcal, P = 0.055), with a nearly significant between-group difference ( P = 0.052).

No significant non-linearity was observed for 30-day, 90-day, or 180-day mortality ( P = 0.168, 0.298, and 0.142, respectively), while a marginally significant non-linear trend was noted for 360-day mortality ( P = 0.052).

The distal-to-proximal approach showed a higher success rate (96.7%) compared to the proximal-to-distal approach (76.7%), with a near-significant difference ( p = 0.052).

Subordinate lions were 4.32 times more likely to maintain possession of the resource post-oxytocin compared to control, but this difference was only marginally significant (Table 1 ; log odds: 1.46 ± 0.75, p = 0.052).

By April, measurements still showed a strong trend towards being higher in invaded plots (F 1,3 = 9.83, P = 0.052), although the difference was reduced by May (Fig. 4 ).