Excerpts

Notably, NRG4 exhibited a near-significant expression difference ( p = 0.0556), supporting its potential biological relevance.

ChR2 and YFP mice did not differently extinguish responding based on press rates within the first extinction session (two-way repeated measures ANOVA, no significant effect of group or interaction, both p > 0.7132, near-significant effect of time F (3.849, 50.04) = 2.508, p = 0.0556; Fig. 3 e) or across three days of extinction (two-way repeated measures ANOVA, no significant effect of group or interaction, both p > 0.6922, significant effect of time F (1.362, 19.07) = 17.24, p = 0.0002; Fig. 3 f).

Furthermore, the Wilcoxon test showed that one-sided p values when comparing the methylation level in site 2 of TD, NTD and ND + NTD with HC group were 0.0038, 0.0252 and 0.0038, respectively; while TD also revealed borderline significance comparing with NTD (p = 0.0559).

A General Linear Model with (1) mean heart rate as a continuous predictor, (2) snout-vent length and body mass at birth as dependent variables, and (3) embryo positioning and clutch of origin as categorical predictors yielded a marginally non-significant effect of embryo positioning F 2, 38 = 3.11; P = 0.056—see Fig. 5 ).

However, maternal TG (log-transformed) tended to be associated with LGA offspring, whereby this difference showed marginal significance by the end of pregnancy (visit 3: OR:3.25, 95%CI:0.97 to 11.42, p = 0.056, visit 4: OR:3.84, 95%CI:1.01 to 15.61, p = 0.048).

12 , the difference between slow-paced and unedited scenes went in the same direction and approached significance ( p = 0.056), suggesting that the null results could be due to low statistical power.

However, beta dispersion analyses showed significance among sampling locations was significant for Bray–Curtis distances (PERMDISP p < 0.001) and showed a near-significant trend for weighted UniFrac (PERMDISP p = 0.056).

Accuracy rates For accuracy rates, the first model with age and retirement was marginally significant and explained 22.2% of the variance ( R2 = 0.222, adjusted R2 = 0.154, p = .056).

In addition, there was a marginally significant tendency ( P = 0.056) for plots with high post-fire age to exhibit lower probability of violet presence (Fig. 2 ; Table 1 , binary part).

Similarly, for maximal isometric force (MIF), the interaction between time and supplementation status approached significance ( p = 0.056).

No significant changes were found in VO2max or countermovement jump ( p > 0.05), while maximal isometric force showed a trend toward improvement in supplemented subjects ( p = 0.056).

Considering only the MEM anticipations towards the target direction, differences between ASD and TD became marginally significant ( p = 0.056, d = 0.5, see Table 4 ).

Serum procalcitonin level had a strong trend to be higher in the BM group than in the VM group (7.1 ± 19.0 vs. 1.5 ± 9.0 ng/ml, p = 0.056).

037 ), while C1M was only borderline significant ( p = 0 . 056 ).

The only exception was 1 M Sucrose, which showed a trend towards reduced responses in p75 − / − mice (p = 0.056).

Multivariate models also provided some evidence for a positive genetic correlation between IGEs on aggression and DGEs expressed in the non-social trait of exploration, although the estimated was marginally non-significant (r G = 0.59, SE 0.28, P = 0.056) (Table 2 ).

The ANOVA revealed the significant main effect of the Object condition (F = 9.84, p = 0.003, η 2 p = 0.159) with a higher hit rate in OP condition and a significant interaction between the two conditions (F = 14.916, p = 0.001, η 2 p = 0.223), wherein + PA condition there was a higher hit rate in OP (M OP = 0.984, SD OP = 0.02) than OM (M OM = 0.997, SD OM = 0.028), meanwhile, the main effect of the Perceived Access condition was only marginally significant (F = 3.813, p = 0.056) with higher hit rate in PA− (M −PA = 0.983, SD −PA = 0.023) than PA + (M +PA = 0.977, SD +PA = 0.028) .

After age adjustment by logistic regression, the overall group effect remained significant ( p = 0.011) and the age-adjusted trend approached significance ( p = 0.056).

Since the aim of a screening programme is the detection of CRC and AA, results are presented for the AN group (712 ± 356 ng/mL), showing statistical differences near significance when compared to no neoplasia (median difference 66 ng/mL, 95% bootstrap CI: −31–190; Mann-Whitney U test, p -value = 0.056).

Physical Function showed a trend toward significance ( p = 0.056), and Social Function also showed a trend-level difference ( p = 0.071).

Although the Pair × Orientation interaction approached significance ( p = 0.056), post-hoc comparisons showed that only the Infant versus Adult comparison demonstrated a substantial orientation difference: the upright orientation ( M = 12.14, SD = 50.47) exceeded the inverted orientation ( M = − 7.43, SD = 63.33), t (870) = 3.66, p < 0.001.

5d ) were taken prior to entry into metabolic chambers, after 1 week in the chambers at room temperature, and after 1 more week in the chambers at 8 °C, and approached significant difference at 15 weeks post-implant (Fig. 5d , p = 0.056).

Only AC5:0 was positively correlated with liver steatosis and negatively correlated with hepatocyte ballooning, both of which were of borderline significance ( p = 0.056 and 0.088, respectively).

Indeed, when compared across the experimental phases, cerebellar cTDCS significantly impaired motor adaptation of the proximal upper-limb compared to M1 stimulation, with a near-significant impairment compared to sham ( p = 0.056).

The similarity between predicted and observed standard deviations was furthermore indicated by significant correlations ( p -values < 0.035) ranging between 0.60 and 0.92, and one marginally significant correlation ( r = 0.56; p = 0.056) for BiHand trials in condition Dyn .