Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

approached significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
Furthermore, the correlations approached significance for lower receptor expression being associated with lower CORT increase in response to restraint (r = 0.50; F 1,13 = 4.23; p = 0.06; Fig. 5c ) and higher CORT after dexamethasone injection (r = −0.49; F 1,13 = 4.23; p = 0.06; Fig. 5e ), whereas we found no significant association between receptor expression and stress-induced CORT (r = −0.28; F 1,13 = 1.10; p = 0.31; Fig. 5b ), negative feedback (r = −0.38; F 1,13 = 2.27; p = 0.15; Fig. 5d ), and CORT after ACTH (r = 0.07; F 1,13 = 0.06; p = 0.81; Fig. 5g ).
a trend towards significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
Analysis of synchronization variability as determined by the standard deviation of tap-to-tone asynchronies revealed a trend towards significance of factor time ( F (1, 17) = 3.91, p = 0.06), while neither stimulation ( F (2, 34) = 0.45, p = 0.64) nor the stimulation x time interaction were found to be significant ( F (2, 34) = 0.048, p = 0.91).
near significancep = 0.061.2× alphagold
Analysis of these data confirms that the tumor burden in the trastuzumab only group was significantly greater (p = 0.04) than that of the trastuzumab + FUS + MBs group (mean tumor volume = 25 ± 17 mm 3 vs 8 ± 5 mm 3 ), and near significance (p = 0.06) was observed between the trastuzumab + FUS + MBs group and the control group (24 ± 7 mm 3 ).
a statistical trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
In order to assess if TMS affected response accuracy we performed an ANOVA that revealed a main effect of TMS site, F (1,23) = 4.15, p = 0.05, ηp 2 = 0.15, indicating that participants’ accuracy was lower during cerebellar TMS compared with vertex stimulation, and a statistical trend towards a main effect of relatedness, F (1,23) = 3.63, p = 0.06, ηp 2 = 0.13, showing that participants’ accuracy was lower for related word-pairs compared with unrelated word-pairs; critically, the interaction TMS site by relatedness was significant, F (1,23) = 5.26, p = 0.03, ηp 2 = 0.18.
a significant trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
The mean ± standard deviation for the minimum variation was 0.39 ± 0.86 mm (95% CI, − 0.33 mm to 1.11 mm) for the test tablet intake and 0.17 ± 0.18 mm (95% CI, 0.02 mm to 0.32 mm) for the control tablet intake, with a significant trend between two groups for the trial tablet ( p = 0.06), order ( p = 0.15), and phase factors ( p = 0.07).