Excerpts

Among males, ADI-R B score was significantly related to Vineland Composite (r = 0.347; p = 0.001), DLS (r = 0.271; p = 0.013) and S (r = 0.284; p = 0.009) in a positive way, whereas ADI-R C score had significant inverse correlations with Vineland Composite (r = –0.493; p = 0.000), C (r = −0.414; p = 0.000), DLS (r = −0.524; p = 0.000), and S scores (r = –0.569; p = 0.000), and marginally significant inverse correlation with MS score (r = –0.245; p = 0.066).

The main effect of relative spleen weight was marginally non-significant (GLMM: B ± SE = −84846.63 ± 24476.89, LR = 3.38, P = 0.066).

At 6-month follow-up, patients with signs of metabolic syndrome showed a trend towards lower PHES compared to patients without these manifestations (− 6.3 ± 1.2 vs. − 3.6 ± 0.6; 95CI = − 0.2–5.6; p = 0.066).

A statistical trend ( p = 0.066) was observed between treatment with tacrolimus vs that of metformin (mean difference = 0.495, t = 2.781; 95% confidence interval = −0.0160–1.006).

Although larger cumulative stone diameter was a marginally significant factor for SIRS (p = 0.066), it was inversely related to BSI (p = 0.026).

For VSV, only eleven reads were detected in one replicate of the direct extraction treatment, whereas thousands of reads were recovered when using high-speed centrifugation (Supplementary Table S1 ), these differences being marginally significant ( t -test: P = 0.066).

There was a slight trend for RD children to receive higher scores on hyperactivity ( p = 0.066) and inattention ( p = 0.079) than TD controls.

As mentioned above, the simple main effect of Solution Style, i.e ., the personal evaluation of each participant about her/his own responses being the result of an insight- or analytic-based problem-solving process, showed a marginally significant effect [F (1,29) = 2.79, p = 0.066].

This decrease was more pronounced for blood-fed than denied mosquitoes, but considerably less so than for samples prepared with the manual method, as noted by nearly significant or marginally significant interactions between feeding treatment and age ( GUY1 : χ 2 = 5.43, P = 0.066; YG2 : χ 2 = 5.83, P = 0.054).

In line, we found a strong trend (p = 0.066) towards higher serum levels of CEA in patients with poorly differentiated tumours compared to moderately differentiated tumor (see Suppl.

Additionally, H15b (CON → PU → CI) had a marginally non-significant mediation effect ( β = 0.080, t = 1.838, p = 0.066).

A three-way ANOVA revealed a main effect of Sex (F(2, 46) = 25.0, P < 0.001), Stress (F(2, 46) = 4.2, P < 0.01), and nearly significant effect of Hemisphere (F(2, 46) = 2.2, P = 0.066) for the Cg3.

The decline showed a trend toward significance (Paired t-test, p = 0.0662).

However, NSAIDs intake was approaching significance ( P = 6.62E-02) but did not pass Bonferroni correction.

There was no association between post-mortem interval (PMI) and TL or mtDNAcn in post-mortem blood samples (Table S4 ). There was a weak trend of sex effect on TL (p = 0.0663), and a statistically significant effect on mtDNAcn (p = 0.0016) in healthy controls; no sex effect on either TL or mtDNAcn was found in suicide completers (Table S5 ).

The difference between Group A and Group B approached marginal significance (M difference = − 0.472, p = .067), while no significant difference was observed between Group A and Group C (M difference = − 0.335, p = .297).

The direct effect of forest cover on PCoA1 was insignificant (coefficient= − 0.285, z= − 1.307, p= 0.191), and the indirect effect of forest cover via PC1 was marginally significant (coefficient= 0.264, z= 1.834, p= 0.067).

However, the slope for CR and AL was only marginally significant at levels of externalizing one SD above the mean ( b = 0.13, SE = 0.07, p = 0.067) and not significant at low levels of externalizing behaviors ( b = 0.05, SE = 0.06, p = 0.42).

ATL GABA- MD network) and showed a marginally significant result (z-score = 1.49, p = 0.067).

The results showed that the effect of diet intervention on hepatic fat reduction remained significant with the adjusted reduction of − 2.51% (− 3.95 to − 1.07%), p = 0.001 and borderline significant for visceral fat reduction, − 654 mm 2 (− 1354 to 46 mm 2 ), p = 0.067.

3 , the correlation between the GMSI and SDA scores was significant for Classical and Jazz ( r (28) = 0.41, 95% CI = [0.06, 0.67], p = 0.024; r (28) = 0.44, 95% CI = [0.09, 0.69], p = 0.016), as well as when collapsing SDA scores across styles ( r (28) = 0.41, 95% CI = [0.06, 0.67], p = 0.025); it approached significance for Random ( r (28) = 0.34, 95% CI = [−0.02, 0.62], p = 0.067); and it was non-significant for Avant-garde ( r (28) = 0.11, 95% CI = [−0.26, 0.45], p = 0.58).

3 B), and the difference in BUN between the two drugs was marginally significant ( P = 0.067, Fig. 3 D).

We would like to note that despite the absence of significant effects in the AAV5 group, there appears to be a non-significant, but strong tendency to reach an early effect at the 30- and 60-min time points, where both ANOVA and post-hoc tests yielded near-significant results (Fig. 3 E; ANOVA 30 min: F 3,12 = 3.102, p = 0.067; Post-hoc Tukey HSD test DCZ 100 μg/kg vs.

A significant difference was found in heart rate (HR) for the HS factor ( P < 0.05), while a statistical trend was observed for the ACT supplementation ( P = 0.067).

We found a marginally significant increase in Ki67 signal in the poor-responder tumors when evaluating Ki67 signal only in EGR1 + /human nucleoli + cells or EGR1 + /human nuclei + cells ( p = 0.067).