Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantP = 0.071.4× alphagold
2 A) with no significant main effect of session [F(4, 120) = 0.22, P = 0.93, η 2 = 0.0002 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0, 0.0003)] and a significant interaction between session and contingency [F(4, 120) = 3.35, P = 0.01, η 2 = 0.004 (95% CI 0.0008, 0.01)], whereas the interaction between session and face perception was marginally significant [F(4, 120) = 2.20, P = 0.07, η 2 = 0.004 (95% CI 0.0003, 0.003)].
Staining for AChRε at this early age showed a statistically significant increase in AChRε-/SV2+ NMJs in DKO muscle relative to control (13.4 ± 2.4% and 4.2 ± 2.2%, respectively; p = 0.008) and a corresponding reduction in AChRε+/SV2+ endplates (89.4 ± 4.5% control, 79.6 ± 5.2% DKO) that almost reached statistical significance (p = 0.07) ( Fig. 8c and d).
an increasing trendP = 0.071.4× alphagold
did not reach statistical significanceP = 0.071.4× alphaplainly factual
In the efficacy group, the LV dimension increased as a function of time as follows: at 4 weeks, Z-scores for MV, AOV, AAO, and isthmus dimensions were significantly greater than those obtained prior to HO therapy (P < 0.01); at 8 weeks, although the MV, AOV, and AAO dimensions demonstrated an increasing trend that did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07, 0.06, 0.1, respectively), the Z-scores of the isthmus in the three-vessel and trachea view (3VT) views were significantly greater than those obtained at earlier time points (P < 0.05).
marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Does this indicate that a protein-like, low molecular weight DOC can also be highly photo-degradable if it has not yet been exposed to sunlight? The marginally significant positive correlation (p = 0.07) between the BR-DOC and PD-E w might suggest that the pools of DOC that support bio- and photo-degradation could be the same ( Fig. 2g ), as further supported by the positive correlation between a254/a365 and PD-E w (p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 2f ).
a statistical trendp = 0.071.4× alphagold
For the GABA/Glu ratio, the 2 × 5 RM-ANOVA revealed a statistical trend for the factor stimulation condition (F (1, 20) = 3.581, p = 0.07, η 2 p = 0.152), no significant effect of the factor time point (F (4, 80) = 0.907, p = 0.46, η 2 p = 0.043), but a significant stimulation condition × time point interaction (F (4, 80) = 2.555, p = 0.04, η 2 p = 0.113).
a trend toward significancep = 0.071.4× alpha
Supplementary analyses of Psilocybin + HE vs psilocybin + HE + B3 * Time revealed a trend toward significance (F (1, 427) = 3.26, b = − 0.56 , p = 0.07), and the three-way Psilocybin + HE vs psilocybin + HE + B3 * Time * Age interaction was identified (F (1, 427) = 6.71, b = 0.66 , p = 0 . 01), indicating that effects were more pronounced among older respondents.
showed a trendp = 0.071.4× alpha
However, when very preterm adolescents with moderate-severe BPD were compared to very preterm ones without BPD, the first group showed a trend towards worse left ventricle function: less shortening fraction (37.5 ± 3.2% vs. 40.7 ± 4.9%, p = 0.07), less ejection fraction (68 ± 4.4% vs. 71.2 ± 5.4%, p = 0.06) and a greater E/E’ ratio (6.4 ± 0.8 vs. 4.9 ± 1.04, p = 0.01).
near-significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Although the binary grouping showed a stronger individual effect, continuous stress remained near-significant as a standalone predictor ( p = 0.07) and consistently contributed to the most explanatory additive models: logConc + Area + Season ( p < 0.001), logConc + Area ( p < 0.001), and logConc + Area + Weight ( p < 0.001).