Excerpts

There was no significant association between Heartbeat Perception Task score and state anxiety ( r = 0.17, p = 0.31), but a marginally significant correlation was found between the heartbeat perception score and the level of trait anxiety ( r = 0.28, p = 0.08).

In each ANOVA, the interaction was significant (Dataset 1: F(1,72) = 24.2 p < 0.001; Dataset 2: F(1,72) = 22.4, p < 0.001) or approaching significance (Dataset 3: F(1,50) = 3.18, p = 0.08), and the effects were in the same direction.

Terrestrial precipitation also shows a positive trend of 0.66 mm yr −2 ( P = 0.08) over the same period consistent with expected water cycle intensification, but this trend is lower than coincident increases in evaporative demand and ET, implying a possibility of cumulative water supply constraint to ET.

There was a marginally significant interaction between Target Category and Saccade Accuracy (F 1,23 = 3.33, p < 0.08, η p 2 = 0.126), suggesting that the difference in latencies according to the target stimulus was more pronounced for correct (25 ms difference with 187 ± 17 ms for Face target and 212 ± 26 ms for Vehicle target) than error saccades (14 ms difference with 175 ± 30 ms for Face target and 189 ± 21 ms for Vehicle target).

A 3-way independent ANOVA (STIMULATION: ACTIVE, CONTROL × STRATEGY: STRATEGY, NoSTRATEGY × CAPACITY: LOW, MID, HIGH) revealed a significant main effect of STRATEGY (F (1,72) = 8.40, p = 0.005, η p 2 = 0.10) with the STRATEGY group achieving larger improvement than the NO STRATEGY group (Dc = 0.63), and a main effect of STIMULATION trending towards significance (F (1,72) = 3.19, p = 0.08, η p 2 = 0.04), with the ACTIVE group achieving larger performance improvements than the SHAM group (Dc = 0.37).

The amount of misses showed a decreasing trend after choline administration ( t (27) = 1.816, p = 0.080).

control) were nearly significant in Experiment 3 (f (1, 39) = 3.36, η p 2 = 0.08, p < 0.08) and significant in Experiment 4 (f (1, 39) = 8.20, η p 2 = 0.17, p < 0.01).

There was a negative correlation of moderate strength between pre-exercise I 229/97 and pre-exercise fMLP-LBCL (ƍ = −0.36, p < 0.05), while correlation between post-exercise I 229/97 and post-exercise rLBCL or fMLP-LBCL reached borderline significance (ƍ = −0.31, p = 0.08 and ƍ = −0.32, p = 0.06).

There was a marginally significant main effect of group on interaction success ( B = 5.83, t (89.62) = 1.77, p = 0.08), and there was a significant statistical interaction between individuals’ mean proportion of peer interactions and group in predicting interaction success ( B = 30.27, t (96.67) = 2.48, p = 0.01; Fig. 2 A).

There was also a marginally significant interaction between protocol and subscale ( F (6, 186) = 5.42, p = 0.08, η 2 = 0.06).

But there was a trend of lower values in the IUFD group with a difference close to significance (p = 0.08).

The interaction effect of group × change in VAS pain score on the insole-based 11-SCT time was marginally significant ( p = 0.080).

attenuata WT ( P < 0.05), between irPMT and WT ( P < 0.05), and marginally significant between irPMT and ISWT plants ( P = 0.08).

Pairwise comparisons showed a trend for a higher AUC C-peptide when comparing both surgery groups to the PSMF diet alone ( p = 0.08 and 0.07 for RYGB and SG vs.

In Oim mice, Col1a2 expression was significantly lower in males and showed a decreasing trend in females ( p = 0.08) compared to sex-matched WT (Fig. 3 B).

Two-way factorial ANOVA found a nearly significant main effect of age group on BA ( n = 69, F(1,58) = 3.14, p = .08), providing some evidence that there may be age differences (Table 2 .).

Additionally, the interaction effect between the two was marginally significant, α = 0.9 (b = 0.62, t = 1.75, p = 0.08).

Analyses of the contrasts of physically different saturation levels (LS versus HS) did not yield any significant regions associated with D 2 BP ND values of any subdivisions of striatum, but the D 2 BP ND value of left executive striatum in the objective faded condition (LS) versus the objective vivid condition (HS) contrast correlated with the left parietal cortex (left inferior parietal lobule (BA 40)) at a marginally significant level (cluster level of p = 0.08, FDR corrected), which overlapped with the left parietal cortex found in subjective faded condition (overlapped region was presented in Supplementary Fig.

First session Apart from previously reported main effects of congruency, RT, and experiment (all p ’s < 0.001), the first session showed a main effect of block that just failed to reach significance, χ2 (2) = 5.05, p = 0.08.

However, the interaction approached the level of significance, F (1, 76) = 3.16, partial η 2 = 0.04, p = 0.08.

Results did not uncover a significant effect of EtOH on pre-CS or CS freezing, although a statistical trend (ANOVA, F [1, 26] = 3.2; p = 0.08) towards a reduction in CS freezing in the EtOH group was detected (Fig. 1k ).

Curiously, a significant volumetric difference between the left (mean = 5198 mm 3 , SD = 495.0) and the right thalamus (mean = 4946 mm 3 , SD = 590.6) was found in patients with nonpainful DPN ( P < 0.01), which contributed to an almost significant left–right volumetric difference in the entire sample of patients with type 1 DM and DPN ( P = 0.08).

In the same model, subfield x quadratic age interactions were significant for subiculum ( p < 0.0001), CA1 ( p < 0.005), molecular layer ( p < 0.0001), and hippocampal tail ( p < 0.0001), with a marginal trend for GC-DG (lin. p < 0.08, quad. p < 0.005; see Fig. 1a , bottom; Tables 2 & 3 , left).

2 i) and a strong trend of decreasing rate of open arms selection ( p = 0.0807) in the high nicotine group (1.65 mg/kg BW, p.o.), similar to what was observed in the ACE group.

The correlation of SpO 2 with ln(ROS) was only marginally significant when time was added to the model (p = 0.081), whereas conversely ONSD was not correlated with ln(ROS) when time was added to the model (p = 0.559) ( Table 2 ).