Excerpts

The statistical analysis showed a highly significant evolution of the sugar ( p < 2 × 10 −16 ) and starch ( p < 1.339 × 10 −5 ) curves in function of the reaction time.

Cross-treatment comparison of the within-participant changes revealed a highly significant reduction in absolute Framingham risk favoring torcetrapib plus atorvastatin over atorvastatin alone (−1.5%; P =2e−16).

We found 1341 of 4404 that passed QC in our own study (30.4%) were nominally associated with ethnicity (p<0.05), which represented a highly significant (p<2×10 −16 ) enrichment.

However, the overlap between these two very different approaches is highly significant (Fisher's exact test, p < 2 × 10 −16 ), and the functional enrichments they identify are similar (see below).

The ANOVA test revealed that the prediction of fresh weight by the finalized model was highly significant ( p < 2e-16).

All other pairwise comparisons were highly significant ( p < 2e-16 ).

The highly significant (β = 2.02, z = 45.64, p < 2 × 10 −16 ) intercept, the model estimate of around 8 roadkill, shows a strong baseline effect for predictors at their reference values.

Of these 316 genes, 81.5% (256) were found in our original list, a highly significant overlap ( P < 2 × 10 -16 , Fisher's exact test), demonstrating the reproducibility of our methodology.

Consistent with previous research ( 34 , 35 ), the RSA model predictions closely resembled listeners’ behavior, with the regression of listeners’ actual choice frequencies against model predictions being highly significant at the group level ( r = 0.89, P < 2 × 10 −16 ; Fig. 2A ) and across listeners (logistic regression coefficient = 5.84 ± 0.17, t 40 = 34.24, P < 2 × 10 −16 ).

We obtained a highly significant interaction effect between hosts and isolates nested within each population for virulence (degrees of freedom = 1,540, F = 2.11, p < 2e −16 ) and reproduction (degrees of freedom = 1,540, F = 2.68, p < 2e −16 ).

The Cox regression p value for all these terms was found to be highly significant ( p < 2e−16).

Immune gene expression differs by tissue The overall effect of tissue (gut versus whole body) on gene expression was highly significant (MANOVA, F 1,89 = 31.34, p < 2 × 10 −16 ).

Again, rs708727 was found to be a highly significant ( p < 2e−16) covariant of all probes, while rs960603 is not.

Thus, it is not surprising that the separation of nationalities due to the co‐dispersion along these two axes is highly significant (MANOVA: P < 2e–16).

One interesting example is glycan 5402, which had a small positive correlation (PPMCC 0.28) with A1AT’s serum concentration when present at site A1AT site 70 ( P = 0.006) but had a strong highly significant negative correlation (PPMCC -0.81) with the serum concentration of A1AT when present at A1AT site 271 ( P < 2E−16) (Fig. 2 F).

The genotype×broomrape race interaction was highly significant for TotAD ( F =3.17, P =2e-16), HeaAD ( F =2.96, P =2e-16), and NecAD ( F =3.63, P <2e-16) ( Supplementary Table S3 ).

The dispersion parameter is clearly significant ( φ ˆ = 9.26 ; p<2e-16), indicating that there is strong evidence of overdispersion in the data that needs to be captured.

The inherited expanded CAG repeat length and the age at sampling were shown to have a highly significant association with the ratio of somatic CAG expansions of the disease-associated allele observed in blood DNA (p < 2 × 10 −16 ).

A resampling approach showed a highly significant association between methylation profiles in blood at baseline and future disease status (P=2.0×10 −16 ).

Statistical analysis via disk diffusion assays revealed highly significant differences in inhibition zone diameters among microorganisms ( p < 2 × 10 −16 ).

AHRR also showed highly significant hypomethylation ( p < 2 × 10 −16 ) ( Figure 4 I), confirming its consistent pattern of methylation loss across both lung cancer subtypes.

This leads to a highly significant coefficient ( β ˆ = 4.68 ; p<2e-16).

To determine the significance of the results, we fit three one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) models comparing ssGSEA scores of CD4, CD8, and macrophage cell type markers, which were all highly significant ( p = 2 × 10 − 16 , p = 6.28 × 10 − 15 and p = 2 × 10 − 16 , respectively).

Phrase duration of female response songs differed highly significant among the five groups of females (ANOVA F 4,71 = 52.7, p = 2 × 10 −16 ).

We observed a highly significant difference from the expected equal distribution (χ2 = 83.143, df = 3, p < 2 × 10−16).