Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

clearly significantp = 0.0040.1× alphaqualified
For all three conditions, the decline in looking time across the four encoding trials was clearly significant (Storyline Condition: F [3, 102] = 4.66, p = 0.004, partial Eta-Squared = 0.121; Pixelized Condition: F [3, 72] = 19.04, p < 0.001, partial Eta-Squared = 0.442; Scrambled Condition: F [3, 102] = 25.74, p < 0.001, partial Eta-Squared = 0.431).
highly significantP = 0.0040.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Comparing the combined intervention arms against control (a secondary comparison) gave a highly significant result ( P = 0.004), although it had not crossed the implicit threshold ( P = 0.002) for proven benefit that was set at the beginning of the study.
a clear trendp = 0.00400.1× alphagold
A direct comparison between SCIgA/M and IgA/M demonstrated a clear trend toward a better protective effect of the former ( p = 0.0040 for Peyer's patches, p = 0.0625 for mesenteric lymph nodes, p = 0.0625 for the spleen, p = 0.8633 for the liver, p = 0.0019 for weight loss and p = 0.1110 for disease scores).
highly significantp = 0.0040.1× alphaqualifiedgold
It is important to note, however, that gestation length was derived from an estimate of foetal age (the exact mating dates for each individual were not recorded), and though seen as a limitation of the data, the estimated difference was highly significant ( p = 0.004).
highly significantp = 0.0040.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Pairwise comparisons show that the difference between onlookers and participants is highly significant in the train scenario, χ 2 (1, 400) = 8.51, p = 0.004, φ c = 0.146, and the large game show scenario, χ 2 (1, 419) = 6.33, p = 0.012, φ c = 0.123, but narrowly failed to reach conventional levels of significance in the small game show scenario: χ 2 (1, 365) = 3.38, p = 0.066, φ c = 0.096.
highly significantp = 0.0040.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Transchromosomic tumours showed an approximately three-fold lower mean percentage of neuroectodermal tissue, both when compared across all tumours (highly significant by two tailed t-test (p = 0.004), and when compared strictly within pairs of tumours which grew in the same animal (n = 16 pairs, paired t-test, p = 0.037), (Fig. 1B ).
borderline significanceP = 0.0040.1× alpha
After correction for multiple testing using the SNP Spectral Decomposition Lite program (number of independent marker loci, 21; p = 0.05/21 = 0.002), only the Dectin-2 rs4264222 and Dectin-2 rs7134303 associations in women retained significance ( P = 3.00 E-04 and P = 9.00 E-04), whereas the associations with DC-SIGN rs4804803, MCP-1 rs1024611 and MCP-1 rs4586 showed borderline significance in the whole population ( P = 0.004, P = 0.006 and P = 0.009; Table 3 ).