Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp = 0.0080.2× alphaqualifiedgold
The positive correlations between resin collection and pathogen loads were highly significant for colonies with additional propolis (Kendall’s rank correlation: V. destructor : z = 2.43, r = 0.47, p = 0.008; DWV: z = 2.58, r = 0.5, p = 0.005), but weaker (Kendall’s rank correlation: V. destructor : z = 1.89, r = 0.37, p = 0.029) or not significant (Kendall’s rank correlation: DWV: z = 1, r = 0.20, p = 0.16) for propolis removed colonies ( Figure 3 a).
highly significantP = 0.0080.2× alphaqualifiedgold
The presence of aggregates at baseline was a highly significant predictor of the clinical response to anti-TNF treatment ( P = 0.008), demonstrating that RA patients with synovial lymphocyte aggregates may have a better response to Infliximab treatment than those with only diffuse leucocyte infiltration [ 59 ].
Advances in rheumatology: new targeted therapeutics.
Arthritis Res Ther · 2011 · PMC3123966
a significant trendp = 0.0080.2× alphagold
Finally, the comparison of the latent classes across the attitudinal and demographic variables, via the Chi-squared and the Jonckheere–Terpstra (JT) tests, revealed that a significant trend exists for the belief that healthcare institutions should provide mediation training (trainbyinstit, JT p = 0.008), with recorded scores increasing significantly across profiles from cautiously positive to moderately supportive to strongly supportive.
markedly significantp = 0.0080.2× alphaqualified
The effect of probucol therapy on long-term survival following complete revascularization was also reported in 1,694 patients after complete revascularization with PCI and/or CABG by a propensity score analysis 45 ) , in which the use of probucol was associated with a markedly significant decrease in all-cause death in a propensity score-adjusted model (hazard ratio = 0.57; p = 0.008).
highly significantp < 0.0080.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Interestingly, despite the fact that the actual target of selection is not known, the clinal frequency change is highly significant ( p < 0.008) based on Student’s t test for 10,000 random sets of SNPs generated by jackknifing 21 SNPs out of the 197 SNPs segregating in the region of interest (3R: 4,239,638-4,271,390, Additional file 1 : Figure S15).
highly significantp < 0.0080.2× alphaqualifiedgold
(Smoothed maps of the annualized, age-adjusted prostate cancer rates for all males in Virginia 1990–99 are shown in Figure 1 .) Statistical testing for global clustering was highly significant for the entire time period (Tango's Maximum Excess Events Test, p < 0.008) and for 1990–94 and 1995–99 separately (p < 0.001 for both).