Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not reach statistical significance”

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 130,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

Confirming the latter observation, we detected significant higher frequencies of Cd11b + Ly6G – Lys6C + monocytes in the livers of Tgr5 −/− compared to WT littermates ( Figures 2 E and S2 A), while frequencies of neutrophils (Cd11b + Ly6G + Lys6C − ) in the livers of Tgr5 −/− mice showed a trend toward upregulation but did not reach statistical significance ( Figure S2 B).
The difference between the prednisolone- and placebo-treated groups did not reach statistical significance for the primary outcome (PANSS total score) after 6 weeks, but we observed a statistically significant difference in the PANSS general score and a nonsignificant trend for the PANSS total score at this point.
Descriptive data showed that treatment-naïve patients receiving RTX experienced no glucocorticoid-related adverse events, whereas relapsed patients exhibiteda statistically significant reduction in steroid dosage and a decreasing trend in relapse frequency after RTX, although the latter did not reach statistical significance.
In our analysis, there was a clear trend toward higher all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in patients with lower ADAMTS13 activity in remission, though this did not reach statistical significance, likely because of the relatively small sample size (98 patients with remission ADAMTS13 activity measures) and small number of events.
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.08571.7× alphaplainly factual
Although a clear trend toward improved healing in Grade 2-infected wounds compared to Grade 4-infected wounds, the difference in histology scores between the Grade 4-infected wounds (histology score: 2.33 ± 0.58) and Grade 2-infected wounds (histology score: 4.25 ± 1.26) at day 14 did not reach statistical significance ( Figure 6M , p = 0.0857).
Among sirtuin family members, SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT4 exhibited >2-fold induction (log 2 FC ≈ 1.0–1.3), whereas SIRT5 showed a positive trend that did not reach statistical significance, likely due to low read counts and partial RNA degradation in irradiated samples.