Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not reach statistical significance”

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 130,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

did not reach statistical significancep > 0.051.0× alphaplainly factual
showed a trendp > 0.051.0× alpha
Although inflammatory markers such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF- α ), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP) showed a trend toward elevation in SAE patients, these differences did not reach statistical significance ( p > 0.05, Supplementary Table S2 ).
an increasing trendP > 0.051.0× alphagold
did not reach statistical significanceP > 0.051.0× alphaplainly factual
Similarly, significant linear increases in TG and HDL-C levels were recorded in the M group ( P < 0.05).Although LDL-C concentration exhibited an increasing trend across acetate-supplemented groups, the differences did not reach statistical significance ( P > 0.05).
At KEGG Level 1, metabolism-related pathways were significantly upregulated, while environmental information processing pathways were decreased in the Mn group ( Figure D). At KEGG Level 3, PCoA analysis again showed distinct clustering between groups ( Figure E), although ANOSIM analysis did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.05).
Notably, we observed upregulation of the neutrophil extracellular trap formation pathway in Trojan dam-PI calf pairs relative to healthy dam-calf pairs, though this trend did not reach statistical significance ( p < 0.05) when comparing Trojan dams to healthy dams alone ( Figure 3D ).
Among the 52 patients in each group matched for age, ECOG PS, and treatment response to R‐MVP, median PFS was not reached in the ASCT group and was 90.0 months (95% CI 41.0–NR) in the WBRT one, but the difference did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.050, Figure 2A ).
Post hoc analysis indicated that the intervention group showed significant reductions in COP trajectory and area under more challenging balance conditions, whereas changes in the control group did not reach statistical significance ( Figure 4 ). sEMG analysis revealed increased activation of the affected-side gluteus medius in the intervention group ( p < 0.05), suggesting enhanced neuromuscular engagement.
did not reach statistical significanceP > 0.051.0× alphaplainly factual
showed a trendP > 0.051.0× alpha
With respect to the lipid profile, although total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels showed a trend toward variation between the groups, these differences did not reach statistical significance ( P > 0.05) [ Table 3 ].