Barely Significant
← all phrases

nominally significant

4,807 sentences · 4,807 papers · 9,414 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.08

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nominally significantP < 0.051.0× alphagold
In patients with moderate or severe DED ( n = 53), PL9643 treatment demonstrated either nominally significant ( P < 0.05) or trending ( P < 0.1) improvement over placebo in mean change from baseline at week 12/day 85 in several sign endpoints, including fluorescein staining in inferior, superior, corneal sum, and total sum regions; Lissamine Green staining in temporal, nasal, conjunctival sum, and total sum regions; and tear film breakup time.
nominally significantp = 0.0501.0× alphagold
Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Upper-Limb Melanoma ( Table 4 ) As illustrated in Table 4 , when comparing nine melanoma patients with upper-limb tumors with the remaining 124 melanoma patients, the only nominally significant findings were a higher frequency of the CT heterozygous genotype (OR = 5.01, p = 0.050) and a lower frequency of the CC homozygous genotype (OR = 0.11, p = 0.040).
nominally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
This is a reflection of a significant skew in the 5hmC fold changes between iPSC and NSC cell lines ( Figure 2C ), with 53.8% of tested sites exhibiting negative FC (i.e., NSC hypo -hydroxymethylation), but increasing to 89.4% among nominally significant t-test results at p < 0.05 ( n = 3,837; none are epigenome-wide significant).
nominally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
Causal effects of SGLT2 inhibition on gut microbiota and metabolites The IVW method revealed 152 nominally significant associations (p < 0.05) between SGLT2 inhibition and gut microbiota, 173 nominal associations with 249 circulating metabolites, and 220 nominal associations with 486 metabolites ( Figures 3 – 5 ; Supplementary Table S4 ). 3.4.
nominally significantP value >0.051.0× alphagold
Tier 1 findings included putative causal associations from the main analysis, which were directionally consistent, at least nominally significant in all analyses and showed no evidence of pleiotropy, that is, the Egger intercept P value >0.05, whereas tier 2 included the remainder of putative causal associations from the main analysis.
nominally significantP < 0.051.0× alphagold
Results for the well-being score were all directionally consistent but none were nominally significant ( P < 0.05). 4. 2-sample MR with non-overlapping depression GWAS Using the PA and ST instruments identified in our MRLap analysis we provide further evidence for the role of PA in depression using the summary statistics from the Wray et al.
nominally significantP <0.051.0× alphagold
Nominally significant ( P <0.05) associations between PGS SCAD and headache were observed in the analyses of African‐ancestry individuals (N headache =179, N control =6817; OR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.06–1.41]; P =6.94×10 −3 ) and South Asian–ancestry individuals (N headache =190, N control =6725; OR, =1.18 [95% CI, 1.02–1.37]; P =2.43×10 −2 ) (Figure [ B ]).