Barely Significant
← all phrases

“showed a trend”

53,323 sentences · 53,323 papers · 65,371 search hits before verification

In the literature

Patients with a response of Grade 2b or higher (n = 18) showed a trend toward better 2 years PFS (86.6%, 95% CI 55.2–96.6%) compared to those with Grade 2a or lower (n = 39; 75.6%, 95% CI 58.2–86.6%), although the difference was not statistically significant ( p = 0.343) (Fig. 4 B).
The estimated somatosensory cortical volume in the AG group (57.427 ± 1.22 mm3) showed a trend toward an increase compared to the IG group (37.632 ± 9.66 mm3) and the FG group (32.697 ± 9.47 mm3) (Fig. 6A ), with a calculated mean error coefficient of 2.1% (see supplementary materials).
Conclusion Although Chlamydia trachomatis infection was relatively uncommon, it showed a trend toward higher rates of intrapartum fever and very low birth weight (<2000 g) among women with preterm conditions.
The age-period-cohort model indicated that incidence and mortality risks increased with age, with a marked increase after 70 years of age; incidence risk showed a “wave-like” pattern of increase-decrease-increase over periods, while mortality risk showed a trend of decrease followed by increase; incidence risk fluctuated upward across birth cohorts, whereas mortality risk fluctuated downward.
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.0601.2× alphaplainly factual
By contrast, in the HLA-DR-strong group, the ICOS-high group showed a trend toward longer cancer-specific survival (CSS), although this trend did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.060).
In multivariable analysis, only histological subtype (HR 4.48, 95% CI 1.13-17.6, P = 0.03) remained significantly associated with all-cause mortality, whereas upregulation of HMGB1 and pT stage ≥ pT3 (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.07-1.22; P = 0.09 and HR, 3.33; 95% CI, 0.84-13.3; P = 0.09, respectively) showed a trend toward association (Table 2 ).
The oral semaglutide group showed a trend of greater reduction in HbA1c for patients aged ≥ 65 years at 6 months, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (≥65 years; −0.80 ± 0.15%; <65 years; −1.22 ± 0.26%; P = 0.18; Figure 4a ).