Barely Significant
← all phrases

“showed a trend”

53,323 sentences · 53,323 papers · 65,371 search hits before verification

In the literature

showed a trendp = 0.0591.2× alpha
Children in subgroup A exhibited better H SDS during puberty and showed a trend toward higher AH SDS ( p = 0.059), suggesting that earlier initiation of therapy may be associated with improved AH outcome, in line with previous reports [ 33 , 34 ].
showed a trendp = 0.0591.2× alpha
11 C-deuterium-L-deprenyl PET region of interest analysis Comparisons of four groups (presymptomatic ADAD carriers, MCI PIB+, sAD and ADAD non-carriers) using Kruskal-Wallis tests in each of 11 ROIs (except for the cerebellum), showed a trend toward statistical significance for the anterior cingulate cortex, the thalamus and the hippocampus (p = 0.059–0.069) ( Supplementary Table S1b ).
showed a trendP = 0.0591.2× alpha
The individual fluid versus neuroimaging tau biomarker models did not differ from each other (plasma p-tau217 versus tau-PET MTL , P = 0.322; plasma p-tau217 versus tau-PET NEO , P = 0.750), while the performance of tau-PET MTL showed a trend toward better performance than tau-PET NEO ( P = 0.059).
showed a trendP = 0.0591.2× alpha
Similar data on medication overuse were unavailable from the US trial, but a secondary analysis was performed and showed a trend towards significant group differences ( P = 0.059). 56 In the European trial the responder rate of at least 50% in reduction of migraine days was significant for topiramate (22% vs 0% P = 0.012), but not in the US trial in which only the under 25% reduction in migraine/migrainous days responder rates showed significance. 57 Patients’ disability and quality of life evaluation results were different in both trials.
showed a trendp = 0.0591.2× alpha
1 . Regression analyses, adjusted for the propensity scores to correct for the identified confounders, revealed that patients in the VKA treatment group had significantly more AsAC and DAC when compared with the non-anticoagulation group (AsAC: odds ratio [OR] 2.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16–4.59, p = 0.017; DAC: OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.22–4.67, p = 0.012) and showed a trend toward a higher calcium score of the aortic valve (AVC: OR 1.92, 95% CI 0.98–3.80, p = 0.059; Fig. 2A ).
showed a trendp = .0591.2× alpha
In this more complex model, the main effect of APOE showed a trend (F(1,68) = 3.68, p = .059, η p 2 = .051), with higher scores for ε4 carriers compared to non-carriers, and there was also a trend for an interaction between APOE and age, with ε4 carriers scoring higher than non-carriers at younger ages and lower at older ages (F(1,68) = 3.60, p = .062, η p 2 = .050). 3.3 Discussion APOE genotype was deemed a possible predictor of individual differences since in adulthood in DS, it increases the risk of AD by a hazard ratio of 1.8 and there is evidence that the genotype also influences early brain development ( Dean et al., 2014 ; Prasher et al., 2008 ).