Excerpts

Further exploratory decomposition revealed a significant time by condition interaction in the 10-min duration group [ F (1,13) = 13.56, p = 0.003, η 2 = 0.51] and an interaction approaching significance in the 30-min duration group [ F (1,16) = 3.19, p = 0.09, η 2 = 0.17].

However, we note that the difference in willingness for finger prick between the two groups is marginally significant, p = 0.09, yielding a larger effect size, r = 0.42 than willingness for taking strong medication, r = 0.29.

The interaction between out-group mating threat and perceived infectability showed a statistical trend among men (β = 0.35, t (28) = 1.73, p = 0.09, R 2 = 0.11, adjusted R 2 = 0.01) but was not significant among women (β = −0.0, t (76) = −0.42, p = 0.67, R 2 = 0.02, adjusted R 2 = −0.02).

In positive persuasion, univariate analysis of variance revealed significant differences between two and four claims, F (1,5) = 7,32, p = 0.009, as well as borderline significant differences between three and four claims, F (1,2) = 2,97, p = 0.09.

Since the correlation between anxious attachment and avoidant attachment scores was marginally significant ( r = 0.146, p = 0.09), a two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with other style scores as a covariant was performed on all dependent variables.

The combined group showed a trend of improvement on TMT-A (combined vs. control, p = 0.09) while memory group did not.

This interaction was significant from 250 to 350 ms ( F = 3.5, p < 0.05) and marginally significant from 350 to 450 ms ( F = 2.9, p < 0.09).

In both language groups, the younger children tended to be less accurate than the older children, although this difference approached significance for the monolingual children, t (60) = −1.75, p = 0.09 (95%CI of this difference [−0.21, 0.01]) and was significant for the bilingual children, t (60) = −3.71, p < 0.0001 (95%CI of this difference [−0.40, −0.12]).

For intensity ratings, the effect of facial expression type did not reach statistical significance [although it showed a trend: F (2,42) = 2.69, p = 0.09, η p 2 = 0.11].

There was a near-significant difference for the younger groups, t (64) = 1.72, p = 0.09 (95%CI of this difference [−0.02, 0.26]), but not the older groups, t (56) = 0.78, p = 0.44 (95%CI of this difference [−0.14, 0.06]).

The model including the three-way-interaction between years of education*sex*stimulation did not show a significant interaction ( F (12,46) = 2.12, p = 0.13), while the model including age*sex*stimulation showed a trend towards significance ( F (12,46) = 2.56, p = 0.09).

Simple slope analyses (See Figure 1 ) indicated that perceived parent support was associated with risk-taking behaviors marginally significant at low levels of self-control ( b simple slope = −0.04, t = −1.68, p = 0.09), but the association was not significant statistically at high levels of self-control ( b simple slope = 0.03, t = 1.29, p = 0.20).

Post-hoc Tukey tests indicated the following pattern of findings in children's proportion of category-match choices: 5-year-old children made significantly more category-match choices than both 4-year-olds and 3-year-olds (both ps < 0.05), 4-year-old children also made more category-match choices than 3-year-old children but this difference was only marginally significant, p = 0.09.

On the other hand, there were differences between the music group and the control group from baseline to year one in the pitch perception task, main effect of year, F (1,46) = 30.42, p < 0.001 and a trend toward significance in the interaction of Group × Year F (1,46) = 2.98, p = 09.

Orienting There was a marginally significant difference between CBT/MT and control groups in RT difference [ t (199) = 1.68, p = 0.09, Cohen's d = 0.24] and no significant differences in % correct difference scores [ t (199) = −1.06, p = 0.29].

Within the temporal measures, a nearly significant group effect was observed in the response time (β = -309.90, p = 0.09), while no group effect was observed in the initiation time (β = -309.90, p = 0.30) and in the motion time (β = -230.80, p = 0.13).

A repeated-measures ANOVA of the percentages of correct responses, with main terms for display type (global-congruent, global-incongruent) and block (1–5), revealed only a marginally significant main effect of block, F (4,60) = 2.04, p = 0.09, but no main effect of display type ( p = 0.21) and no display type × block interaction ( p = 0.86).

7 A follow-up analysis revealed the purchase x attitude x argument quality interaction was marginally significant b = 0.08 SE = 0.05, t (226) = 10.72, p = 0.09, 95% CI [−0.01, 0.17].

The final step also showed a trend toward a two-way interaction between mindfulness and eating disorder cognition (β = -0.16, p = 0.09; Step 3 R 2 Δ = 0.03, p = 0.09).

1 The VTA/SN activation for the OXTR rs53576 interaction at T2 was only marginally significant at p = 0.09.

AON AON analyses demonstrated a marginal trend for the effect of movement intensity, F (2, 58) = 2.42, p = 0.09.

Marginally significant differences were found in comparison between the early and baseline periods ( t = −1.68, p = 0.09; β′ = −0.06, 95%, CI [−0.13, 0.01]).

The analysis revealed a significant intercept, F (1, 16.07) = 7.37, p = 0.02, indicating above chance performance, and a marginally significant effect of inference, F (3, 9.26) = 2.88, p = 0.09.

We found a (partial) correlation of −0.26, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.09), indicating that our assessment of the SZ patients' degree of exploitation may, to some extent, reflect the severity of their positive psychotic symptoms.

Moreover, the correlation coefficients of MEIV increased in the post-test of the empirical priming compared to the counterfactual condition, with a significance ( p < 0.01) appearing in the behavioral intentions of MEC and MEE and a marginal significance ( p = 0.09) in the MEIH.