Excerpts

There was a marginally significant effect of “time period” on general stress scores: F (1.87,216.49) = 3.10, p = 0.051.

The highest foreign language score ( β = 0.154, p < 0.001) and whether they had participated in intercultural training ( β = 0.110, p = 0.008) remained significant, while the influence of education status approached significance ( β = 0.085, p = 0.051).

According to the reduced model the proportion of L2 speakers had an inverse and borderline significant effect on the degree of inflectional synthesis (log(λ) = −0.398 ± 0.21; χ 2 (1) = 3.798; p = 0.051).

Another multiple regression on the total number of blocks to reach the learning criterion against both distances led to a nearly significant standardized coefficient for the Within-Cluster Distance (β = 0.269, p = 0.051), ending up with a global non-significant fit [ F (2,51) = 2.28, NS].

The same model was marginally significant for gesture imitation, F (7,101) = 2.10, p = 0.051, R = 0.36, R 2 = 0.13.

In the analyses of error rate, only the main effect of Cue Type approached significance ( F 1 , 50 = 3.99; p = 0.051, η 2 p = 0.07), indicating that participants made slightly more errors on the arrow (4%) than on the gaze condition (3.3%).

A paired samples t -test showed that there was a marginally significant difference ( t = -2.024, df = 35, p = 0.051) in the difference in pitch range (Tones 4 – 1) between IDS (mean = 97.724 Hz, sd = 75.934) and ADS (mean = 66.987 Hz, sd = 60.927).

The results revealed that the main effect of time on BMI was nearly significant [ F (1,50) = 3.998, p = 0.051, η 2 p = 0.074], indicating a trend of change in BMI over time.

The interaction of time x basepower showed a trend ( F 3, 75 = 2.703, p = 0.051, η2 = 0.098), while the factor group ( F 1, 25 = 0.931, p = 0.344, η2 = 0.036) and the interaction time x mismatch did not reach significance ( F 3, 75 = 1.478, p = 0.227, η2 = 0.056).

We compared US of the low capacity group between the pre- and post-training time points, and found that their post-training US showed a trend toward being reduced relative to their pre-training US ( t 13 = 2.15, p = 0.051).

This effect of framing condition was qualified by a marginally significant interaction between framing condition and age [ X 2 (2)=5.93, p =0.051]; specifically, the effect of the Extrinsic framing condition relative to the Neutral framing condition grew significantly less strong over development [ b =1.92, SE =0.88, 95% CI (0.19, 3.66), p =0.03], but no such age-related change was observed in the effect of the Intrinsic framing condition relative to the Neutral framing condition ( p =0.82).

The difference between the first and second transfer phases approached significance (Mean Difference = −0.456, p = 0.051), with a Cohen’s d of-1.813, reflecting a large effect size but indicating that this difference was less consistent or reliable compared to the other comparisons ( Table 2 ) ( Figure 5 ). 5 Discussion The present study investigated the impact of implicit and explicit learning on motor task performance across three sessions.

For accuracy, there was only a marginally significant main effect of attended stimulus, F (1,8) = 5.3, p = 0.051, η p 2 = 0.40.

Relatedness had a near-significant effect on plausibility ( B = 0.09, p = 0.051).

A T-test was performed, finding with marginal significance longer RTs for congruent ( M = 2.331 s, SD = 0.752) compared to incongruent ( M = 2.041 s, SD = 0.471) trials, t (31) = -2.03, p = 0.051.

And also showed a marginally significant ( p = 0.051) effect on learning.

In addition, we noted that in the regression predicting DTS, the negative association between the use of sedatives and DTS was only marginally insignificant ( p = 0.051) ( Table 4, Panel F ).

Indirect connections from the STP were also significantly greater in the water condition with the insula ( p = 0.021), the ACC ( p = 0.017), the hippocampus ( p = 0.027), and marginally significant with the amygdala ( p = 0.051).

However, reading span correlated positively with performance accuracy in nonnative speakers ( r = 0.396, p = 0.022) but not in native speakers ( r = −0.023, p = 0.906); the difference of these correlations was a strong trend ( z = −1.632; p = 0.051).

There was a near-significant trend for male dogs to look at the food location more frequently than female dogs (GLMM: F 1,21 = 4.300, p = 0.051).

When the anger modality was the body, the interaction between the emotion compound type and group was marginally significant [ F (2,74) = 3.10, p = 0.051, η 2 = 0.08].

The likelihood ratio test comparing the full and null model revealed that trial had a marginally non-significant effect (χ 2 = 5.943, df = 2, p = 0.051), and attentiveness did not have a significant effect (χ 2 = 2.884, df = 1, p = 0.089) on the elephants' choice to approach the cooperative partner.

Further, the tendency for men to appraise their voice experience as more benevolent than women approached significance [ t (111.89) = 1.96, p = 0.051].

In addition, there was a main effect for mode-of-thought [ F (1,96)=6.24, p <0.05], as well as a marginally significant order × mode-of-thought interaction [ F (5,92)=2.31, p=0 .051].

As for the balanced trials, group effect was marginally significant, F (1,38) = 4.07, p = 0.051, η 2 p = 0.09 and math anxiety did not interact with number of digits ( p = 0.75).