Barely Significant

Excerpts

7,030 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
In subgroup analyses ( Figure 5 ), we found marginally significant results favoring boys vs. girls in children aged 3 (SMD = 0.27 (95% CI 0.00, 0.54), p = 0.05) and significant results favoring boys vs. girls aged 4, 5 and 6 years (SMD = 0.58 (95% CI 0.38, 0.77), p < 0.00001; SMD = 0.59 (95% CI 0.31, 0.88), p < 0.00001; SMD = 0.81 (95% CI 0.61, 1.01), p < 0.00001), which increased with age. 3.6.
nearly reached significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
ot included within the 95% confidence interval for the difference, while the Level 2 green exercise participants ( M = 4.378) were significantly greater than those of Level 3 green exercise ( M = 3.506) ( p = 0.011); (3) the main effect of experimental treatment on the number of posture transitions nearly reached significance ( F (2,89) = 3.99, p = 0.05 , η p 2 = 0.064), with a moderate effect size, and zero was included within the 95% confidence interval for the difference, while the Level 3 green exercise participants ( M = 12.030) were almost significantly greater than those of Level 2 green exercise ( M = 4.650) ( p = 0.050); (4) the interaction between experimental treatment and social interaction on the number of sitting posture reached significance ( F (2,89) = 4.246, p = 0.044 , η p 2 = 0.068), with a moderate effect size, and zero was not included within the 95% confidence interval for the difference.
marginally significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
In addition, we carried out the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to investigate the absolute stability of scores, and found that, despite the tests were statistically or marginally significant, the effect sizes suggested that these differences were negligible (BOA/SUB: Z(98) = −1.95, p = 0.05, r = −0.14; SUP: Z(98) = −2.12, p = 0.034, r = −0.15; BOA: Z(98) = −3.12, p = 0.002, r = −0.22). 4.
marginally significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Results: The unadjusted difference between ASD and TD groups in terms of geometric mean blood Pb concentrations was marginally significant ( p = 0.05), but for Al concentrations, the adjusted difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.06).
highly significantp <0.051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Values where p <0.001 were considered highly significant while values where p <0.05 were considered significant on the average.
approached significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
However, social service use interacted significantly with family ITN to predict Expressive Communication Standard Scores (ITN × social service utilization: β = −14.1, p = 0.02) and approached significance for Total Standard Scores (ITN × social service utilization: β = −8.9, p = 0.05), suggesting that the depth of poverty moderated the relationship between social services utilization and language skill ( Table 2 ).