In the milk samples collected from homes, highly significant positive associations ( p ≤ 0.05) were noted between Ni and Zn ( r = 0.884), which were followed by strong positive relationships between Ni-Cr, Pb-Cd, and Zn-Cr.
Excerpts
For the unstable force platform, the SD along the AP axis with eyes open has shown a marginally significant effect of training (F(1, 26) = 4.17; p = 0.05) and a significant interaction of training and group effects (F(1, 26) = 7.40; p = 0.01).
There was a negative effect of the abbreviated brand name on intention to purchase, but it was only borderline significant ( p = 0.05). 4.
A statistical trend was declared when one indicator was significant and the other one was not (e.g., p > 0.05 and Cohen’s d ≥ 0.2).
In subgroup analyses ( Figure 5 ), we found marginally significant results favoring boys vs. girls in children aged 3 (SMD = 0.27 (95% CI 0.00, 0.54), p = 0.05) and significant results favoring boys vs. girls aged 4, 5 and 6 years (SMD = 0.58 (95% CI 0.38, 0.77), p < 0.00001; SMD = 0.59 (95% CI 0.31, 0.88), p < 0.00001; SMD = 0.81 (95% CI 0.61, 1.01), p < 0.00001), which increased with age. 3.6.
The testicles in G2 presented moderate signs of degeneration ( Figure 4 C), showing clearly significant differences compared to those seen in lower concentration groups ( p <0.05).
nearly reached significancep = 0.05
ot included within the 95% confidence interval for the difference, while the Level 2 green exercise participants ( M = 4.378) were significantly greater than those of Level 3 green exercise ( M = 3.506) ( p = 0.011); (3) the main effect of experimental treatment on the number of posture transitions nearly reached significance ( F (2,89) = 3.99, p = 0.05 , η p 2 = 0.064), with a moderate effect size, and zero was included within the 95% confidence interval for the difference, while the Level 3 green exercise participants ( M = 12.030) were almost significantly greater than those of Level 2 green exercise ( M = 4.650) ( p = 0.050); (4) the interaction between experimental treatment and social interaction on the number of sitting posture reached significance ( F (2,89) = 4.246, p = 0.044 , η p 2 = 0.068), with a moderate effect size, and zero was not included within the 95% confidence interval for the difference.
Among females, the model accounted for 7% of the variance in depressive symptoms; however, only screen-based sedentary behavior was the marginally significant predictor (β = 0.14, p = 0.05).
The other two variables indicating socioeconomic position (housing and household assets) were also statistically significant ( p < 0.001) and showed a positive trend ( p < 0.05).
Only mouth width showed a moderately significant positive correlation with the amount of jackscrew activation ( p < 0.05). 4.2.
In addition, we carried out the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to investigate the absolute stability of scores, and found that, despite the tests were statistically or marginally significant, the effect sizes suggested that these differences were negligible (BOA/SUB: Z(98) = −1.95, p = 0.05, r = −0.14; SUP: Z(98) = −2.12, p = 0.034, r = −0.15; BOA: Z(98) = −3.12, p = 0.002, r = −0.22). 4.
Results: The unadjusted difference between ASD and TD groups in terms of geometric mean blood Pb concentrations was marginally significant ( p = 0.05), but for Al concentrations, the adjusted difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.06).
tendency towards significancep = 0.050
With a tendency towards significance, music teachers showed higher odds of being anxious compared to non-music teachers (OR 1.34, p = 0.050).
Values where p <0.001 were considered highly significant while values where p <0.05 were considered significant on the average.
Female students showed a borderline significant, higher likelihood of appropriate knowledge compared with male students (AOR = 1.63; 95% CI: 0.999–2.65; p = 0.050), while age group was not significantly associated with knowledge ( Table 6 ).
borderline significancep = 0.05
In this same model, census tracts composed of a high percentage (>50%) of lower-middle class residents ($22,500–$55,000 household income) had more TRI facilities than more affluent tracts (borderline significance p = 0.05).
Patients with stage IV disease also had a worse prognosis in DSS, but this did not reach statistical significance in this model (aHR = 2.566, 95% CI: 0.999–6.594, p = 0.05; Table 3 ).
approached significancep = 0.05
However, social service use interacted significantly with family ITN to predict Expressive Communication Standard Scores (ITN × social service utilization: β = −14.1, p = 0.02) and approached significance for Total Standard Scores (ITN × social service utilization: β = −8.9, p = 0.05), suggesting that the depth of poverty moderated the relationship between social services utilization and language skill ( Table 2 ).
As for TMD, the increase was borderline significant ( p = 0.05) in NW group.
approached significancep = 0.05
Although core temperature approached significance, there was not a significant effect of time ( p = 0.05); core temperature was not different from baseline and had recovered.
There was an increasing trend in UI prevalence with age in both sexes (both p < 0.05; Table 2 ).
There were no differences between control and exposed groups in terms of height, weight, or smoking status ( p = 0.18, 0.20, 0.98, respectively); age was marginally significant ( p = 0.05) with the mean age in the control group slightly higher than that of the exposed group.
were higher (at the limit of significance level, p > 0.05) than at 10:00 a.m., while in the CG, they remained at a similar level. 3.3.
showed a trendp = 0.05
Age had a significant level of correlation with walking program adherence ( n = 8, r = 0.72, p = 0.019), and it showed a trend with exercise program adherence ( n = 7, r = 0.60, p = 0.05).
borderline non-significantp > 0.05
Finally, a post hoc power calculation was performed, and type-II error rate was added for borderline non-significant results (0.1 > p > 0.05). 3.