Barely Significant

Excerpts

8,476 sentences · 1 filter applied

nominally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
Of these 20 metabolites, only five showed nominally significant univariate differences between ME/CFS cases and controls (indole-3-propionic acid, aminomalonate, ornithine, leucine, and succinic acid; all p < 0.05), while the majority—including proline and indole-3-lactate, the constituents of the top-ranked interaction term—did not reach univariate significance in isolation ( p = 0.777 and p = 0.237, respectively).
highly significantp < 0.051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
With respect to wound-healing responses, BC-CFS enhanced the expression of the regenerative mediators Notch2, CCN1 (CCN family member 1) and DAGKc domain-containing protein, with highly significant increases ( p < 0.05, p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). 2.6.
nominally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
Despite limited overlap at the single-metabolite level between the two overall OC outcomes, we observed greater concordance at the pathway level: among nominally significant pathways (raw p < 0.05), arginine and proline metabolism and beta-alanine metabolism overlapped across the two outcomes ( Figure 1 E; Supplementary Table S4 ).
nominally significantp -value ≥ 0.051.0× alphagold
Whenever applicable, a gene should show nominal significance (unadjusted p -value ≤ 0.05) and a concordant directionality for the effect estimate in sensitivity analyses, including the weighted median, MR-Egger, and MR-PRESSO, while the MR-Egger intercept should not be nominally significant ( p -value ≥ 0.05).
nominally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
Although no individual lipid species remained significant after Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate correction, the lipid alterations showed systematic class-level trend which was significant for several lipid classes under Fisher’s combined probability test (as seen in Figure 1 ), and therefore, species-level results are still reported as nominally significant (unadjusted p < 0.05).
showed a trendp < 0.051.0× alpha
While PPRH2 showed a trend toward greater single-agent activity, these differences were statistically significant only when comparing DOTAP to PPRH2 ( p < 0.05) and Sc9 to PPRH2 ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 3 A), indicating that this concentration was appropriately sub-cytotoxic for combination studies.